My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/12/1993 SCHOOL COMMITTEE Minutes
>
7/12/1993 SCHOOL COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2018 5:10:45 PM
Creation date
5/14/2018 1:18:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/12/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br /> r Page Eleven <br /> Mrs. Dunivan, "I don' t know. I 'm afraid I <br /> this, don' t know � . <br /> That there rust be an account for theommunit <br /> y School. <br /> * �� <br /> Dr. e oura, "'the state dives you the responsibility of community <br /> mmun�.ty <br /> implications, if I can use that tern, the School Committee. it <br /> Mrs. Caffyn, ' And the school has given it over to thea because <br /> they voted to give it. 1# <br /> Dr, Del oura, "The Town took a vote and voted toitY <br /> o the by <br /> haws and, as <br /> I recall, this whole thing started because there was <br /> discussion of expanding the horizons of that agreement. And that <br /> is really what precipitated most of this discussion. " <br /> Mr. Roberts, 'Let me rake a comment, You know, I think we ' ll <br /> agree that everybody' s to serve the community and I didn' t come <br /> in here to listen to all of this infighting and all of that <br /> because I don' t do it very well, l do know that 0 of companies <br /> . and municipalities their problems stern from communications . <br /> r About it is miscommunication and what we have -here is <br /> another miscommunication. I don' t think the miscommunication i <br /> necessarily from the Leisure services to you because as I <br /> understand it, we donut have any mandate to get our programs <br /> approved. a (Gus) has a mandate to bring them.to s to be <br /> 4 <br /> ip approved. That' s the first thing, as I understand itd Maybe Ivm <br /> wrong, I don't know. And I don' t really care who spent $559 <br /> because .it' s all the community v s money and if it went to ag o <br /> cause that' s fine with me. From the eery first beginning, if we <br /> go back. and we check the notes, I think a number of us have <br /> concern and the concern is what is Leisure services supposed to <br /> be I keep hearing this thine about Community School. I have no <br /> clue what it is, I don' t know wham it does and I don' t know why <br /> it keeps getting called on and talked about. I don' t necessarily <br /> agree that we should keep it, I don' t care who has i�t. l really <br /> don' t care* It doesn' t make any difference to me. And I don' t <br /> care if this committee is in charge of it. Human services which <br /> there isos retiing afoot to make us handle human services or <br /> not . It doesn' t make any difference. what we need is a clear <br /> mandate as to what we're working on.' If we're just going to work <br /> f on Parks and Recreation cani t r <br /> g his man bus directive <br /> and he can work on Parks and Recreation� period. And I could <br /> care less because it' s not turf to me. I 've got a different <br /> business. It' s no skin off anybody' s vases as far- as I 'm <br /> concerned. What I 'm saying is that whoever puts these by laws <br /> together and says ' this is what you' ll do, ' ought to rake it real <br /> clear as to what we' re doing. As far as I understand it this <br /> committee is in charge of Community School as i <br /> t used to be <br /> defined. If we ' re not, somebody just say that. That ' s all <br /> really care about and I think the committee only cares about <br /> a <br /> t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.