My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/8/2018 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Minutes
>
5/8/2018 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2018 5:10:02 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 9:43:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/08/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOTION: Ms. Wilson made a motion to name the committee, Mashpee Inclusion and Diversity <br /> Committee (MDIQ, subject to Selectmen approval. Ms. Brown seconded the motion. All voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> It was determined that approval from Selectmen regarding both the name and the mission, would be <br /> sought once the mission was finalized. Ms. Waterman suggested that voting occur by roll call vote. <br /> Review Status of Voting & Non-Voting Membership-The Chair suggested requesting that <br /> the Board of Selectmen appoint Ms. Johnson-Graham as a voting member to the Committee in order to <br /> vote at the next meeting. <br /> MOTION: Ms. Wilson made a motion to accept Winnie Johnson-Graham as a voting member <br /> subject to the approval of the Selectmen. Ms. Nadeau seconded the motion. All voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> Chairman Stevenson also asked that the Committee support the Student Liaison, Mr, Gonsalves, as a <br /> voting member of the Committee because he would be 18 in August. Ms. Nadeau inquired whether <br /> Ms. Johnson-Graham was appointed by the Tribal Council and Ms. Johnson-Graham confirmed that in <br /> addition to being nominated by the Tribal Council, she had also expressed interest in being involved. <br /> The original Committee was created with 9 members, 7 voting members with 2 alternates, in case of <br /> absence, resulting in a quorum of 4 members. It was suggested that the Town Clerk be invited to the <br /> meeting to clarify the quorum. Ms. Dami confirmed that the quorum for the Committee of 7 voting <br /> members would be 4, because it represented more than 50% of the 7. Membership of the Committee <br /> could be redefined in the bylaws. Named, appointed alternates could be voting members only when <br /> there was an issue of quorum or a conflict of interest. Additionally, non-voting members could be <br /> appointed to the Committee, such as the student liaison. The Chair inquired whether a non-resident <br /> could serve on the Committee and Ms. Dami recommended asking the Board of Selectmen. The Chair <br /> suggested the possibility of the student liaison becoming a voting member and Ms. Dami responded <br /> that, to become a voting member, the individual would have to be 18. Ms. Dami suggested staggering <br /> the first set of appointments and recommended possibly one alternate, Ms. Waterman inquired about a <br /> slot for the Boys & Girls Club because Ms. Provost may not always be available to attend and Ms. <br /> Dami responded that it would need to be a specific person. It was determined that Boys & Girls Club <br /> would remain a non-voting position. <br /> The Chair indicated that original member, Ms. Morris, was unable to attend the meetings, so she would <br /> be kept in the loop, but would likely withdraw her voting membership and submit a letter of <br /> resignation. Current voting members would include Chairman J. Marie Stevenson, Gail Wilson, <br /> Lynne Waterman, JoAnn Nadeau, Winnie Johnson-Graham and Katherine Brown, resulting in one <br /> voting member and two alternate openings. <br /> New potential members were invited to attend today's meeting. Letters of interest had been submitted <br /> previously. Ms. Waterman discussed the typical process for considering potential new members to a <br /> committee, including interviews and discussion to consider each candidate, without them being <br /> present, in order to determine who best to recommend to the Board of Selectmen. Ms. Landry stated <br /> that a reason would need to be identified should a candidate not be a good fit for the Committee. Ms. <br /> Nadeau inquired whether the previous meeting with the candidates would be considered an interview. <br /> Ms. Doyle had attended today, but was unable to stay and Mr, Horner was invited to attend, but did <br /> not. The Chair suggested that the Committee work toward identifying its title, mission and bylaws <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.