My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/28/1985 PERSONNEL BOARD Minutes
>
10/28/1985 PERSONNEL BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 3:16:40 PM
Creation date
7/23/2018 3:15:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PERSONNEL BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/28/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Personnel Board Meeting <br /> Minutes of October 28, 1985 Page 3 <br /> their gob descriptions were not,up to date. Mr. Smith said that they reviewed job <br /> . descriptions which were sent to them. Ben Lofchie said that they were the current <br /> job descriptions which the Personnel Board has on file. <br /> The Town Accountant asked that they address what their goals were in doing the study. <br /> Anita Tekle said that the Personnel Board had a request for a proposal to look at the <br /> town's current salaries of management positions, survey neighboring towns to get some <br /> information on what other towns are paying and to devise a reclassification system <br /> which was both internally and externally equitable. <br /> Chairman Sullivan commented that the Selectmen set up the goals and the Board went along <br /> with what they wanted to get done. . As far as input on the goals, Chairman Sullivan said <br /> that the question :should be addressed to the Selectmen. <br /> With reference to the job description of the Town Planner, Carrie Saunders commented that <br /> the Personnel Board only has one job description of the Town Planner as he was the only <br /> one that the Town ever hired in that position. Tom Fudala commented that there was a <br /> change made by the Selectmen last October. Chairman Sullivan said that the Personnel <br /> Board never received it. Ben Lofchie commented that if the Board didn't receive it, they <br /> couldn't know there was a new job description and as far as the Personnel Board is con- <br /> cerned they only had the job description prepared at the time when the Board interviewed <br /> candidates for the position. Tom Fudala said that the job description prepared then was <br /> a short and abbreviated thing for a town which never had a town planner and didn't know <br /> what a town planner would be doing. Selectman Hanson said that a question should have <br /> been brought forward at the time of the interview with the consultant if there had been <br /> • a big discrepancy on the job description. Tom Fudala said that he did talk to them about <br /> it and it is reflected in the report as far as stuff about conservation officer. He said <br /> that hectried to discuss the job description and they didn't seem interested. The Board <br /> requested a copy of the changed job description. <br /> Anita Tekle said that people's functions will always change as workloads and demands <br /> change but a job description is not intended to list every absolute item that someone <br /> does but the general nature of the responsibility. If the examples of duties change <br /> without significant changes in the levels of responsibility or independent action, there <br /> is no need to update the job description. A job description should be generally written <br /> which should be good for a period of time. Anita said that they were under the impression <br /> that the job descriptions were accurate and if they were not, they would be happy to take <br /> another look at them. <br /> Doug Boyd said that it was over a year ago that Mr. Murphy asked him to rewrite the <br /> Building Inspector job description and that he does not know what happened to it. He <br /> said the Building Inspector in Mashpee has far more responsibilities than in any town <br /> on the Cape. <br /> Verne Polka commented that since the consultant considers the job description as a general <br /> essence of what your primary duties are and in comparing the Town Accountant in Barnstable, <br /> she said that she didn't think either job description says that they prepare the budget <br /> for the Finance Committee. Yet, it was indicated that it was one of his duties (the <br /> Barnstable Town Accountant) and that it was not one of the duties of Mashpee's Town <br /> Accountant. Mrs. Polka said that it is- a duty of the Town Accountant in Mashpee to pre- <br /> pare budgets for the Finance Committee. Anita Tekle said that it was specifically listed <br /> as many towns have financial people or someone else directly working with the Finance <br /> Department. Anita Tekle said that if the budget was her responsibi3Ly that would be some- <br /> thing that would normally be in a job description. Verne Polka said that all Town Accoun- <br /> tants are responsible for the budget. Anita Tekle said that not all 'Town Accountants are <br /> responsible for preparing the budget. Verne Polka said that Mass. General Law says they <br /> are. Anita Tekle disagreed and said that Town Accountants- are responsible for monitoring <br /> budgets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.