Laserfiche WebLink
on 15 ,000 gallons but they do agree it is not 28,000 gallon , it may end up <br /> 18 or 20 , 000. <br /> Bob Fournier said they are also wiling to look at regulations they have in <br /> place that raise the cost of the plant and are willing to listen to Woodard <br /> and Curren ' s recommendations to satisfy them in a less costly way for this <br /> community. <br /> Paul said he has a letter form the Selectmen authorizing additional funds <br /> for Woodard and Curran. <br /> Bob Whritenour said the letter does not determine the amount of money at <br /> this time. When the scope of the study is defined they will put a dollar <br /> figure on it. The Selectmen understand the time crunch because of the <br /> change in engineers . <br /> Paul explained Woodard and Curran needs additional funds for additional <br /> scope of work: to provide factual data to certify the size of the plant <br /> (gallonage) , and look at potential alternative systems . They are asking <br /> for $20 , 000. We need for them to get going ASAP. <br /> Steve asked when they found out about the meeting because he would have <br /> been interested in attending , especially if they were discussing a modified <br /> RBC? <br /> Paul said they did not know what would be discussed. DBP volunteered the <br /> modified RBC. He mentioned it to Steve last week , that they would be <br /> setting up a meeting for early this week. <br /> Steve said he made a request for information from the architects last week <br /> and has not heard back . <br /> Bob said he will follow up, he had given direction to have that information <br /> sent. <br /> Steve wants an idea of where the costs were. A phone call is sufficient . <br /> Paul said he also needs that information. <br /> Bob said that information should not be "published" made available to <br /> everyone. <br /> Peter said it sounds like DEP is being really flexible. The new firm <br /> (Woodard and Curran) seems really flexible also. <br /> Paul made a motion that SMMA tell Woodard and Curran to start on <br /> the additional study , subject to working out the details of the <br /> fee. Merry Sue seconded the motion. All members were in favor 7-0. <br /> Bob said they are ready to present their recommendation to the DEP to <br /> develop a plan for chemical discharge (chemical waste from the Chem labs) . <br /> He elected not to discuss it at today's meeting with DEP. it should be <br /> part of Woodard and Curran ' s study . <br /> LAND ACQUISITION <br /> Dan Solien submitted a pre-final acquisition plan that addresses all the <br /> loose ends of the prior plan. <br /> The Fields Point properties do abut and they are not land locked . <br /> Remaining issue is the Com Electric easement, what process will be used to <br /> abandon it. <br /> Paul had told Town Counsel that Dan would be calling him to resolve it. <br /> Bob Whritenour said town counsel needs to know there is no deed reference . <br /> 3 <br />