My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/13/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
12/13/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:25:00 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:23:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/13/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Paul asked which is more economical ? <br /> Composition board is about 1 less per foot than wood . <br /> Bill said people have been using cedar for hundreds of years , You can <br /> bleach i t, stain it and it doesn ' t blister or peel . You will have problems <br /> with paint. <br /> Ed said their recommendation i s for cedar . <br /> They presented product literature on the other 2 products. <br /> The cement board is a new product to the market.. <br /> Merry sue asked how long cedar will last before needing replacement? <br /> Phil said cedar has lasted on buildings for 100 years , with some attention . <br /> Steve said if you stain it when installed and do nothing else it will last <br /> 0 years at least. will the other product last 50 years? We don ' t know. <br /> The Committee does not need to make a decision tonight* <br /> Ed said there is more competition for cedar and you will probably get a <br /> lower price. The grade of cedar w i 11 be VG hard. <br /> Paul said his only concern is the maintenance of the cedar, Any product on <br /> the building needs a long life because the school department will not have <br /> the money for maintenance . <br /> Phil suggested they could back prime the cedar . <br /> Paul asked SMA to explore the cedar and any potential products to extend <br /> it's life- coatin or back priming . The Committee would also like to see a <br /> sample of the composition board in the color SMMA would be recommending <br /> Gym Di v i d i n g Wall . Phil e p l a.i n ed the state has suggested" the wall come <br /> f + <br /> dawn between the 2 gyms , They will not fund the auxiliary gym with the <br /> wall . They are proceeding with that <br /> He wants to explore possibilities of how those gyms could now be used -� <br /> seating , basketball courts , etc,, <br /> H presented a. sketch of the ori gi nal layout and anoth r pussi bi l i ty. To <br /> use the space in it' s entirety, to use the full volume of space he suggests <br /> centering the bleachers and one basketball court. There will still be3 <br /> urts� using a hierarchy of paint on the floors. <br /> Bill said the state won ' t accept the wall but did accept the gym, that <br /> doesn ' t make sense. <br /> Phil said he can ' t speak for them but thinks a rigid wall applies that you <br /> could use the gym during the school day for community use . <br /> Merry sue doss not see a benefit to moving the bleachers to the middle, <br /> unless the space is so tight under the basketball courts ' without the <br /> change, you could have another activity going on . <br /> Janice said it now seems more like a field house , without permanent <br /> bleachers you could have an indoor track . <br /> Phil said you can ' t have a track because of the wood f l oo r and it does not <br /> have the dimensions for that. <br /> He believes � gives the new arrangement ran mens neo r flexibility for use and seating . <br /> Merry sue suggested showing it to Gus Fredricks and Dr,, DeMou ra first. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.