Laserfiche WebLink
Road Improvements (continued) page 9 <br /> roadway improvements supervision. Paul questioned what we <br /> bought for supervision in the contract from our road engineers . <br /> Joel informed we will be handling the construction observation on <br /> a periodic basis for contract compliance and pay requisition <br /> review. Paul said we need to make sure that Greg Taylor is <br /> satisfied;' Joe1 agreed. <br /> 6 . Budget and Expenditure : Position to end of Q2 , 1996 <br /> Ian said there may well be additional work involved; we accept <br /> the responsibility, but it does not come within our contract. <br /> Paul informed that we will know when your services are no longer <br /> needed; atthat time, we will review the contract; he feels this <br /> should not be a disputed item. <br /> Tom distributed copies of a 13-page handout, the Budget and <br /> Expenditure Position Statement as of 30th June 1996 (twelve <br /> sheets ) and one cover page. Paul informed that he asked the Town <br /> of Mashpee ' s Treasurer to issue a report of expenditures to date; <br /> he then asked Tom to reconcile that report with the monies we <br /> have paid out. Tom informed he met with the Town Accountant; <br /> within a few dollars , we agree totally with the Town ' s records . <br /> Tom 'and Paul quickly reviewed and explained the cover page and <br /> each sheet of the report; particular reference was made to Sheet <br /> 9 of 12 , Possible Future Commitments Beyond Due Completion. Tom <br /> said this page was prepared as a "worst case scenario" in the <br /> event September 30th is the substantial completion date; the <br /> total is $48 , 200 . Paul explained that we wanted to make sure we <br /> had enough money to cover the whole budget in case Stone is five <br /> weeks late ; if this happens and all items are approved, we will <br /> have enough money. <br /> Paul had made particular reference earlier to Sheet 1 of 12 , <br /> Possible Expenditure of Contingency Fund, $1 ,158 ,259 ; he now <br /> pointed out that this figure could be tied in to the figure of <br /> ( 48 , 200) on Sheet . 10 of 12 under column Possible Expenditure. <br /> The $48 , 200 is fully explained on Sheet 9 , as noted. <br /> Tom and Paul again referred to Sheet 10 of 12 , Possible recovery <br /> of back--charges from Contractor (157 ,126 ) ; Paul pointed out that <br /> this is the figure we will be looking to go back to Stone on; <br /> Sheet 11 explains each item and dollar amount that total the <br /> $157 , 126 . Paul feels that all of these monies may be subject to <br /> negotiation; today he has made Town Counsel aware that discussion <br /> with Stone ' s legal staff should start soon; we will be putting in <br /> a claim and intend to hold back on one of their final <br /> requisitions . <br /> Upon question, Paul informed that damages will be a separate <br /> item, perhaps negotiable in closed session. Damages can be <br /> withheld from payment; we will withhold enough money that we feel <br /> is reasonable to cover our cost. <br />