My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/10/1995 SOUTH CAPE BEACH ADVISORY Minutes
>
5/10/1995 SOUTH CAPE BEACH ADVISORY Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2018 5:03:55 PM
Creation date
11/28/2018 2:37:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SOUTH CAPE BEACH ADVISORY
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/10/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
l ' <br /> SOUTH CAPE BEACH <br /> MAY i , 1995 <br /> PAGE 5 <br /> , Kirsner stated that the committee is entitled to the entire plan- <br /> ning process and everything else that relates to the development of <br /> the beach. Morris suggested that Nick change the language toincor- <br /> porate the language that he had used. Morris referred to the response <br /> that Nick wrote - just enlarge it to .incorporate the note that he had <br /> with reference to #67, <br /> Discussion of issues by the committee <br /> Woods: General editorial comment on the revision to the manage- <br /> m ntplan: (First 'age) In Breading through it., I made this comment <br /> previously, but revision does not carry it. I am still concerned <br /> about the title of the recreation area and the confusion that may be <br /> engendered because of the entire area yrs, the recreation area. I <br /> thought that if in the second paragraph, if you could say, $tan area <br /> of approximately 30 As Is the recreational area. " , rather than at the <br /> end to suggest the people look at the plan of that area, we have to <br /> be very careful in avoiding confusion as to what is being addressed <br /> and what isn't. <br /> Sandi : The only concern that I have about doing that is it is some- <br /> what misleading.. I don't want to gave people the impe sion that there <br /> is 30 A of beach area. <br /> W. woods : I am unhappy with the language ' within the limits of the <br /> natural and cultural resource to provide the highest quality recre� <br /> ationai experience for the greatest number of people& " I would sug- <br /> gest that we further define what you are trying to accomplish here by <br /> sabring. something to the effect, "to prevent the overburdening of the <br /> resource resulting in its degradation, there is a parking limit at the <br /> recreation area of 200 cans. " <br /> Sandi stated that they would- be able to add. innie' s suggested phrase. <br /> innie: There was only one minor thing that I saw in the document it- <br /> self: "Garbage Gans" .There were comments relative to the neem for <br /> garbage cans. When I went through the revision, it states that"trash <br /> barrels will be located at pedestrian access and egress sites, sites <br /> to the boardwalk and parking area" . There was talk about put- <br /> ting the trash barrels on the heard. I understand that makes for a <br /> logistical problem for the DEM personnel., but unless there are con- <br /> venient trash receptacles, they are not going to be carrying their <br /> trash back. <br /> Cramer referred to #72, Bruce McHenry's written comments relative <br /> to his concern about boats landing on the beach. <br /> Winnie: Since this is designated beach area, where are the designated <br /> swim areas? Are you going to have buoy markers? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.