My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/04/2005 SOUTH CAPE BEACH ADVISORY Minutes
>
01/04/2005 SOUTH CAPE BEACH ADVISORY Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 5:00:38 PM
Creation date
11/29/2018 2:53:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SOUTH CAPE BEACH ADVISORY
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/04/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Cape Beach State Park Advisory Committee 2 <br /> Minutes <br /> January 4, 2005 <br /> III DISCUSSION OF STATUS of 10 ACRE SITE (Continued) : <br /> Jack Cramer explained. that he had spoken with Pegg.i Konner, <br /> Matthew Patrick ' s Legal Aide once, and had made some notes, <br /> but when it carne to prepare for the January 4 , 2005 meeting <br /> he stated that he was not really confident that e fully::,unerstoo <br /> what she had explained the Legislator's position was on this <br /> bill. Tack Cramer attempted to call Peggi Konner back, and <br /> Matt Patrick answered the phone. Therefore, Jack asked what <br /> was going on with this; what do we have to ego to get the bill <br /> passed? <br /> Rep. Patrick has indicated that he had assumed the resp nsi- <br /> bi l ity for filing the appropriate legi s.lation to affect the <br /> transfer of title to the 10 acre -site in-house bill <br /> dated July 16, 2003. Rep. Patrick has indicated that Bill <br /> No. 3938 did not get out of committee -and did not go to the <br /> legislature' s floor for a vote, ' because there was' not lan- <br /> guage agreement between DCR and the Mashpee Board of elect- <br /> men and the "Committee" . Before Rep. Patrick can file a new <br /> bill for the transfer of the 10 acre site to I ashpee, the <br /> exact language, terms and conditions if am of the transfer <br /> must be finalized between the involved parties hd-!__that language <br /> be incorporated in the new bill, <br /> Bill suggested that we recommend that the selectmen put a <br /> time-limit on it. <br /> Tack followed up with maybe there has to be legal action taken, <br /> Maybe the Town has to sue the state to get Article 17 to hap- <br /> pen. <br /> m. Cramer explained: "I have a committment to Rep. Patrick <br /> to help push along the new bill. The passage of the new bill <br /> will reflect the end of all the negotiations concerning the <br /> to acre site. The finalization o the l �_acre site status is <br /> important, not only to the committee but t; 1 particularly to <br /> our former chairman Morris Kirsner. " <br /> Iv WHERE DOES THE COMMITTEE WANT To Co FROM DERE <br /> G!.' Stone Memorial with names : This is one of -the items that <br /> has been on our list for two or threerears. Jack explained <br /> that he had brought up the subject of the stone memorial <br /> with Christine and Joe , Jack wanted Christine to read <br /> it because it said, "Chairman Kirs er ade. of ren e..:.to._�:a.. <br /> coittment- made..by DEM1,1_--Cofnmissioner, Richard Kendall <br /> some years ago, that upon completion of the process , <br /> there would' be a stone memorial inscribed with the names#fr <br /> Chm. Kirsner had appointed a sub-committee to follow up <br /> on this commitment in 2002 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.