Laserfiche WebLink
the DPW would want to have the apron paved in the Creat Neck Road layout. 11th. Costa <br /> suggested that the soil in the area was sandy and did not anticipate soil issues, and although there <br /> were no a the maintenance plan would be in ply. Regarding paving from Creat beck <br /> er � p <br /> Road South to the basins,-Mr. Costa stated that the applicant had already indicated that it was not <br /> an option. <br /> The Chair inquired of the Board their thoughts n whether to relocate the road t the proper <br /> layout. fi <br /> r. Cummings s and 1 r. al nni felt that the road should be moved to its layout. fir. <br /> Koohrin was not at issue with the road as it existed but with abutter support to relocate, 111r. <br /> Kooharian alsoorted l it in its proper-layoutl. r. Costa recommended leaving both . <br /> pp laying g <br /> options in the decision. Ms. a an expressed her preference that both options not be placed in <br /> decision articulare if the abutter most affected b the change supported laying the road out <br /> the d particularly <br /> t -proper layout. yg <br /> �n Y <br /> . r er la . lis. wa inquired about the status of the existing gay and it was stated <br /> that-the h homeowner would need to loam and re-seed the area. Mr. Costa stated that they would <br /> d seed s it was rivate , and echoed his nest leave both options within <br /> not learn n p Ppm <br /> the decision.ion. Nor. Rowley referenced the old Asher's Path that was eliminated and landscaped <br /> and recommended that an approval should include inl loaming and seeding the <br /> abandoned mess by the developer, fir. Costa again pointed out that it was on private property <br /> but W. Fudala responded that-thehomeowner submitted a letter indicating his willingness to <br /> work cooperatively.. r. Rowley pointed out that the equipment would already be at the location <br /> ' n drainage and laying out the new road. h-_ Costa stated that wording would need to <br /> working o y <br /> about um`n the ro 'ate permission. Il r. wall expressed concern if the <br /> be included � g pP <br /> homeowner did nott sion. A condition will be drafted incorporating"if"the owner <br /> � �r <br /> agrees." <br /> was consensus to strike option I but fir. udala suggested that 1r. Rowley first review <br /> Where l <br /> plans prior to <br /> finalizing the decision. Mfr. Rowley will work with Mr. Costa regarding a plan and <br /> present his <br /> recommendations to the Board. Mr- Costa asked to close the hearing-and reopen for <br /> rent in two weeks but 1r. udala stated that the hearing needed to continued. <br /> co . <br /> Way inquired whether the applicant would wept the condition of transferring the <br /> � � <br /> affrle parcel within three ears of the date of endorsement of tine special perm and fir. <br /> dab <br /> responded that the did it. Ms. waygan asked that the wording b added to#3, <br /> fl;X11 respo y �t <br /> must be completed within three ears. There was discussion regarding whether the zoning <br /> - - n the <br /> needed to be art of the decision. Mr. Fudala stated that the applicant was working o <br /> bylawp . . <br /> anon agreement which would allow no more than 3 bedrooms. Additionally, the home <br /> meg � � , . <br /> would not be part o the association a it mould b� an additional cost burden. <br /> p <br /> Mr. wall referenced the stop i � <br /> radar, and stated that the applicant had asked that <br /> � <br /> and <br /> the <br /> Board reconsider the radar sign due to the added vqxmw. Mr. Fudala stated that it was <br /> located under Trac Ilio ati noon that it included -way stop si and $3,040 toward the <br /> radar. 1 �r. Costa suggested that the funds could be better spent elsewhere. The Chair indicated <br /> . <br /> his fish to first hear from the public. <br /> 3 <br />