My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/15/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/15/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2020 11:17:00 AM
Creation date
1/2/2019 1:50:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would be payment for services provided by GID. with no additional discussion, the Chair <br /> called for a vote. <br /> All voted unanimously. <br /> -GHD Notice of Project Change <br /> The Chair referenced the memo about the Mashpee Notice of Project Change. W. Gregg <br /> explained that as part of the NffiP ►process and due to the size of the,project, GHD has been <br /> required to keep various entities and agencies statewide informed about the project. The <br /> agencies and entities have been allowed to'review and comment on the project.- If'the project <br /> goes beyond 3 years from the original Environmental Notification Form, then a Notice of Project <br /> Change must be submitted to MEPA requesting approval to continue the project. The last Notice <br /> of Project Change was submitted in November 2007. W. Gregg ai so noted that GHD�s original <br /> contract did not provide for multiple Notice of Project Changes. The memo provided by Mr. <br /> Gregg.estimated a$2,000 cost for GHD to complete the.work and submit it to 3 o different <br /> entities. Mr. Gregg indicated that, should the Sewer Commission hire a staff person, that <br /> individual would be aide to complete the necessary paperwori to extend the filing. The Chair <br /> inquired about the deadline and Mr. Gregg responded that it should be submitted after 3 years <br /> but that the'preiouxs TQC was filed after 6 or 7 years. The Chair suggested that the Commission <br /> hold off on asking GHD to complete the paperwork until they'confirm whether or not the <br /> Commission's Articles requesting funds for an Administrator will be on the May Town Meeting <br /> Warrant. Commissioners were in agreement. <br /> { <br /> -Regina villa Associates Public outreach <br /> i <br /> Mr. Gregg reported that he had received-comments from Beverly Kane, Mr. Malarkey and <br /> Chairman Fudala regarding the text for the tri-folds and posters. Mr. Gregg will have the graphic <br /> designers incorporate the changes and provide a draft for the Sever.Commissioners to review. <br /> Display materials are available for the tri-fold when it is complete_ Mr. Gregg indicated that a <br /> small poster will be placed at the back door of Town Hall in order to direct people to the <br /> information kiosk that will be located near the front door. <br /> -GIE[D Transfer Station Site Vesting Status <br /> Mr. Gregg stated that requests had been sent out to MBE general contractors. Mr. Gregg <br /> expected to hear back in another week. It was reported that the Department of Public works has <br /> completed the clearing at the site. The project will move forward once a contractor has been <br /> identified. W, o"Nara inquired whether any local contractors.lead been invited to be considered <br /> for the job and Mr. Gregg responded that GHD was required to contact NMEIVVBE contractors <br /> and that two Cape contractors had been contacted. Mr. O'Hara stated his preference that <br /> Mashpee contractors be invited but Mr. Gregg responded that he was restricted to MBWB <br /> general contractors but if there was an eligible Mashpee contractor,they could be considered. <br /> Chairman Fudala referenced the $15 oo listed on the invoice that had been reserved for <br /> MBE/"E businesses. <br /> i <br /> Lombardo Associates <br /> -SRF Loan for Popponesset PRB <br /> Chairman Fudala reported that Mashpee was notified that they were approved for a 2% SRF loan <br /> with no loan forgiveness for the Popponesset PRB project. The Chair expressed disappointment <br /> about the result. Mr. Lombardo stated that everyone was disappointed arra that everyone � <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.