Laserfiche WebLink
e , <br /> comply with the building plan and that the sidewalk be eliminated on the north side in order to <br /> allow a larger fire lane. <br /> Chairman w Agan inquired whether Mr. Roy l "s comments would be incorporated into the <br /> plan. Mr. Sullivan indicated that the suggestions would not be problematic and stated that he <br /> could confer with lir. Rowley about stormwater design to ensure compliance. Mr. Sullivan <br /> stated that inconsistencies would be addressed. Mr. Rowley noted that there vas information <br /> missing regarding storm rater msanaprement, such as the operations and management plan, <br /> calculations for the corner of Industrial Drive and additional inornnation about the connections <br /> for the roof gutters. <br /> Mr. Fudala stated that applicant would be returning to the Design Review on ittee on May <br /> and suggested that the applicant could return to the Planning Board at the next meeting on May <br /> . <br /> MOTION: Mr. Babranni made a motion to continue the public bearing to May 4 at <br /> p.m. Mr. 1 Mullin seconded the motion,. AU voted unanimously. <br /> "7:45 Public hearing regarding two zoning articles proposed for action at the May 2,2011 <br /> Annual Town Meeting <br /> At 7:45 p.m., Chairman 1 a rgan read for the record the public hearing notice for the two zoning <br /> articles. Mr. Fudala referenced the email received from Eric Carlson regarding FEMAs effort to <br /> rescind the Letter of Final Determination for Barnstable Counter. The Chair referenced Article <br /> 181, which calls for an amendment of Article I 1 Flood Zone Provisions of the Zoning Bylaw. <br /> Mr. F data reported that FEMA adopted new maps and recommended that revisions to the <br /> Zoning Bylaw would be needed by Jure 16 as a condition for eligibility for the Flood Insurance <br /> Program. An Emergency Article was droned but FEMAhas since rescinded their request and <br /> recommended that the process to adopt the new maps be stopped due to technical problems with <br /> the reaps. It was expected that the neaps would be finalized by December 11, 2011. Mr. Fudal <br /> stated that there were problems with the 1 lashpee reaps which placed the town line in the wrong <br /> location. The Town Manager has expressed frustration that funds were spent to announce the <br /> public heaving. Mr. hudala noted that the Subdivision Regulation amendrnent,would not take <br /> effect dine the wording Utilized. <br /> MOTION:- Mr.Ba r-rni made a motion to recommend to postpone Article 18 to Town <br /> Meeting. Mr.Mullin seconded the motion. All voted un aimou. ly. <br /> Article 17 was-drafted to allow he ap oirrt ent of alternate Phuming Board and Board of <br /> Appeal members to the Design Review Committee. The amendment was an effort to ensure <br /> quorum at the meetings. There was no public comment. Board members were in agreement that <br /> the amendment was a good idea. There was discussion reprding whether a specific individual <br /> should be appointed as an alternate or whether any individual should be appointed as needed_ <br /> MOTION: Mr.Brini made a motion to close the public Dearing on the Town Warrant <br /> It was noted that some wording had been changed, replacing Board of Zoning Appeals- ith <br /> Board of Appeals. <br />