05/07/2019 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Meeting of Mashpee Plan Review Committee Held Tuesday, May 7, 2019 Mashpee Town Hall Waquoit Meeting Room Charlie mentioned that the C-3 District requires 40% of the property to be left in its undisturbed natural state. Town Planner: Evan Lehrer, Town Planner mentioned the following items: • The Planning Board may require a more detailed landscape plan as part of the requirement for the Special Permit. • The zoning aspect of the Special Permit process complies with zoning and is required for the building permit. • The Special Permit application is required prior to construction. • A comprehensive landscaping plan will need to be satisfactory to the requirement of the naturally vegetated open area will need 40%of the lot area. Evan suggested that it might be prudent to review the Cape Cod Commission guidelines. • The permitwill be under the Light Overlay District which in the C-3, and 1-1 district. Since this is in the C-3 district, the plan makes good use of the accessory uses and is designed to accommodate. • The short side of the building displayed along Rte. 130, and the Planning Board has the jurisdiction to decide the frontage of the building. • The architectural design looks great.The other note is to confirm the property line adjacent to the residential parcel. • The Planning Board application will require some site lighting that was discussed at Design Review. Ensure that any site lighting on the building, around the landscaping, accessory structures, and parking lot area are within the boundaries of the lot lines, and comply with the zoning bylaw and not throwing.any lighting to adjacent parcels. • The Planning Board application will require the lighting scheme and fixtures. Building Department: Charlie Maintains, Building Inspector mentioned the following items: • The sign location should be noted on the lot, and on a revised plan. There should be no view obstruction. • Where a lot fronts on routes 130, 151, and 28, that side shall be considered the front, this site plan meets the requirements for parking on the side and rear. • The plan depicts the rear as Evergreen and should be designated as the side of the building. • The pavilion itself looks like it does not meet the setback requirements. Evan mentioned that he had a previous meeting with the applicants and Mike was present and mentioned that the setback for the pavilion should be treated like a shed which is 5 ft. Charlie said that the footnote is for 120 sq. ft. and a maximum building height of 12 ft. Charlie did not know what was discussed, but the pavilion does not meet those requirements. That may be a topic of discussion. • This project will need to meet the 2015 International Base Code (IBC) with Mass Amendments and applicable I-codes. 4