My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/16/2019 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
>
07/16/2019 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2019 5:01:35 PM
Creation date
10/15/2019 12:41:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/16/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of Meeting <br /> Plan Review Committee <br /> Tuesday, July 16, 2019 <br /> Charlie mentioned that this project will require controlled construction. <br /> There were no more questions from the committee or applicants. <br /> Glen Harrington made a motion to approve the plan with the conditions; <br /> • The design data be shown that it's retail and not office. If there's <br /> administrative office, the square footage will be added to the design <br /> portal. <br /> • The reserve area for the leaching shown to be built out at the time of <br /> construction. <br /> • The Board of Health must approve the site septic plan at a board <br /> meeting. The septic is proposed underneath the pavement which is <br /> a Title 5 variance to be discussed at the Board meeting. <br /> • The Building to have a sprinkler system because the building is over <br /> 7500 sq. ft. <br /> • Fire protection engineer to provide controlled construction <br /> documents. <br /> • Alarm system. <br /> • There are no compactors proposed on site. <br /> Evan believes that the proposed square footage is what is requiring the <br /> applicant to pursue all the Variance relief. He believes there will be less <br /> or no relief necessary with a smaller proposal. Evan said he is not in <br /> favor of the motion, so he asked Glen if the vote on his motion should <br /> be noted that he believes that the proposed square footage is requiring <br /> the request for variance relief. Evan said he is not opposed to the use <br /> but he questioned the need for variance relief is a result of the proposed <br /> square footage. The request to construct a near 10,000 sq. ft. building <br /> is creating a non-compliant situation, and is creating a hardship. <br /> Glen amended his motion that the recommendation of the size of the <br /> building-is requiring the variance relief. <br /> Rodney second. The committee voted; 4 in favor and 1 opposed. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.