Laserfiche WebLink
.rt• <br /> Torn said the first task should be to work out the database structure. <br /> John asked who has ownership of the documents, is that in the contract? <br /> Tom said-the Sewer(-*Iom' mission owns the documents. <br /> Yilw IL Ste, 1 said it 1 -Ali affi same' guage uadi paragraph r. <br /> +`+ i . C711 to lew- * " a `S r(s-r i 'S rw T s r -•t}tt <br /> 0 ' 'review a"1 In order to get a man po'n s for the town. <br /> I orm wants them to be sure it is presented as a watershed management plan, not a traditionai <br /> facilities plan. <br /> Regulatory meetings: T om explained that 3LA nact thoug I nt we couid cut out i termemate <br /> me i g-Mj, rOUgh,IVMrA special procedures. Tom spore vvi j' MErA wno Baia no puoile hearings <br /> are required,in reiore rye wouid hke to in or a e some of a rote meetings. I he <br /> commi siola w 't�i [ like l see the process oorair ieci DuL avoit I d any necessary mays. <br /> S&W said they ab ed -new prase Whichsw nna: es the scope wr envi�•oamen ijrev erg <br /> process. Ts is how it wiR be worked into,tie contract. <br /> Torn asked if they propose meeting With everyone before putting together scope? They do plan <br /> on at. I hey w� serg e i ri meeting a s s fne tape Cod-Commission and DES' <br /> what they plan t do and ask i they can incorporate public review but not public ineanngs. <br /> Pie is technologies. <br /> fir*said inis is the iist of technologies they said they would-evaluate. They have experience <br /> WWI-a mo!A•afl U1-tile IIsL. f hey Mil coiiect. r nt i4oTmation abort the sysiern . <br /> Tory was dlsappointecI that no proposais included i 'eas lime land acquisition as a means of <br /> reducing nitrogen loading. We want to look at aiI possible means: regulations,fertifi ation <br /> practices, education, 'land acquisition. T" ose have to be In'the cost benefit matrix. <br /> Tnis snowa not De limited to wastewater issues. <br /> Phase IM Alternative Scenarios: 1 om said SEA had proposed corning phases 4 and doing <br /> one aCtlernative screening analysis,'ftot a 2"i.ayet d,pr c ss. Vvhat is their opinio t 'it seems like <br /> it COUIU save time and money. <br /> S & YY as eu ii Lnt y eon see 's scope and ievei cif enort in ns area. h seemed it rn iLhe <br /> RYP that this had been given a"i t of thought already. I'llese will be tough&Cisions to be made <br /> by tine Sewer Comrrfission. They ink the current approach of narrowing down the options and <br /> "then going forward is a good one. <br /> Tom had concerns as to whether this is the best way to approach this. Are the consuitants being <br /> forced to do work that is not necessary. <br /> John asked if t5nan is s supposed to tell S & W where the hot spots are, areas to concentrate on. <br /> ei <br /> zpasw said-no,they will determine Mai. 1 here is iang age in the proposal that separates'die <br /> Z%r*du�ies 1 �!v ,MU 1jr. Howes.es. �& W will develop existing mirogen loading and,Dr. Howes <br /> will"twee " ibern a1inie and calibrate his water quality model. He will .detennine chtical <br />