My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/5/1999 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
4/5/1999 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2019 2:06:46 PM
Creation date
12/9/2019 2:06:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/05/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
:. <br /> John Ramsey said USGS is doing a lot modeling for the base. <br /> Torn asked Dr. Howes if there are any charges which should be made to the scope? <br /> Dr. Howes said the real issue is interface, to be sure we"re both comfortable S&W and Dr. <br /> Howes). As a team we have to decide what the watershed boundaries are that we will use. He <br /> would like the flexibility to use a different map, if everyone gees, and it is available before the <br /> start of phase 1. <br /> S&W need the map agreed upon at the notice to proceed with phase I because GIS work is the <br /> first step. <br /> Fort questioned the schedule page : are we on schedule as written here? <br /> Dr. Howes asked S&W if they started July 1,when would they need this infoxnnation' <br /> S&W would like it to state a number of days from notice to proceed. They need 120 days after <br /> notice to proceed. <br /> 'one asked homer 10 model runs relates to Phase IV, V and VI <br /> Nate said it is based on the proposal from John Ramsey. They took the pricing from CMAST <br /> and worked it into the proposal. He did not envision a model run for each scenario. They will <br /> have recommendations of how much loading can be put into a watershed and what is existing. <br /> S&W won't give you an alternative less than the target. <br /> Tom was anticipating something in the model that tells us one alternative is better than the other. <br /> r. Howes said it is a location issue, that may have different effects. <br /> lot can he handled with a discussion and you can work from there. <br /> Tom is leaning toward budgeting as many models runs as we need. He needs a total, final dollar <br /> amount for the town meeting article. He thinks there should be more than 10. <br /> Nate said they were given a price of S 1,500 per model run. <br /> John Ramsey said they will discount that if there i si <br /> xgnificant amount of additional runs. <br /> r <br /> John said the more we run the model we find out how to save more money on implementation. <br /> • <br /> Dr. Howes said that is correct but you begin to get limited returns. <br /> Tom would like to take out the 10 model runs and will leave it flexible with our contract with <br /> Dr. Howcs. <br /> Nate said they will be relying on Dr. Howes for text on the model for their report. Dr. Howes <br /> �Il provide that to theca, <br /> Phase VIA: Worn said we may want to drop this if preliminary scenarios say it is not needed or is <br /> not cost effective. Can some of this work be done in the earlier phases. <br /> S&W planned to look at this at the same time as the other scenarios. Tom would like this to <br /> state that we many not go forward with this. S&W will re-draft it so we get the information we <br /> need to make that decision. <br /> Tom said Mas pee Commons and Talanlan will need some answers. Talanian is filing now and <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.