My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/5/2020 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
3/5/2020 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2020 12:31:44 PM
Creation date
4/22/2020 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/05/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Harrington stated that he was asked by the Town Manager's Office to give a detailed account of <br /> the administrative record for this complaint, most likely to explain the activities that have <br /> occurred and the lack of compliance that would support the need for Town funds to possibly be <br /> expended. Mr. Harrington did go out to the property earlier that day to check if the refuse pile <br /> had a cover on it,which it did not, but it did not look like there was any recent activity either. Mr. <br /> Harrington brought to the Board's attention that their decision and the subsequent order letter <br /> did not give a timeframe within which the refuse pile had to be covered; therefore, he <br /> recommended that the Board clarify that so it could be enforced. A couple of Board members <br /> stated that they had seen Mr. Cabral's truck previously on the road, presumably conducting <br /> business without a permit. Mr. Harrington informed the Board that, when he visited the site <br /> earlier that day, Mr.Cabral's container truck was parked at the property. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel asked if DEP had taken any action and Mr. Harrington answered that they have <br /> held off on any enforcement because the Town was addressing it. Mr. Harrington stated that he <br /> had been in contact with Michael Whiteside of DEP, who is monitoring the situation through the <br /> Site Compliance and Enforcement Division. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Mallory Langler moved to require a tarp to be <br /> placed over the refuse pile at 81 Echo Road within three days of receipt of the order letter. Motion <br /> seconded by Veronica Warden. VOTE: Unanimous (3-0). <br /> 2. Review of Short-Term Rental Property Regulation. Veronica Warden brought up the previous <br /> request by a rental property owner to be"grandfathered"with respect to rooms/occupancy. She <br /> reminded Board members that it should be based on and enforced according to Title 5, taking <br /> into consideration whether the property is in a Zone II, what the septic system can legally <br /> accommodate, and what the records show the property to be permitted for. Ms.Warden,felt <br /> strongly that the Board shouldn't vary from what it has been enforcing in the past, witiVrespect <br /> to the septic capacity and occupancy. Mr. Harrington responded that there is a difference <br /> between setting the number of bedrooms, which is what the Board has historically done,versus <br /> setting occupancy. Mr. Harrington made the point at the last meeting that nowhere in Title 5 <br /> does it specify two people per bedroom. The 55 gallons/day per person did not carry through to <br /> the 1978 code or any subsequent code, and is not enforceable in Mr. Harrington's opinion. He <br /> reiterated that,while the Sanitary Code determines occupancy based on habitable space and the <br /> total square footage of the home,Title 5 does not specify how many people,per bedroom. <br /> Mr. Harrington advised the Board that the Town of Eastham has capped occupancy at two people <br /> per bedroom, plus two. Ms. Langler stated that both Falmouth and Yarmouth have capped <br /> occupancy at two people per bedroom. She noted that Eastham uses the Sanitary Code as the <br /> basis for determining occupancy and stated that, under the Sanitary Code, theoretically, a <br /> "sleeping area" could include a living room as long as that space meets the requirements of a <br /> sleeping area. Ms.Warden reminded the Board that those spaces do not necessarily have privacy, <br /> and that is not consistent with the definition. of a bedroom. Chair Baumgaertel reminded <br /> everyone that septic systems are based on the number of bedrooms and not the number of <br /> occupants, and an overloaded system puts the public health at risk. He suggested sticking with <br /> the definition of a bedroom for purposes of the regulation. Mr. Harrington stated that the Board <br /> can be more strict than Title V and the Sanitary Code in its regulation,but it has to be in black and <br /> white if it is going to be enforceable. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that, if there are existing rooms in a home that are not in compliance, in <br /> cases where an applicant is seeking a rental certificate, the Board has the right to determine <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.