01/21/2020 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Meeting Mashpee Plan Review Committee Tuesday,January 21, 2020 Mashpee Town Hall Waquoit Meeting Room The existing septic tank right now is exactly 10 ft. off the front of the existing dwelling, and the proposed plan shows a 4 ft. bump out towards the septic tank which would require a variance from the Board of Health. Evan Lehrer: Evan asked if the office space above the garage will be a single person office only conducting business. Mr. O'Shaughnessy said the office is just being used for the owner's personal use. Evan asked Charlie if the garage setbacks are 15 ft. on the side and 40 ft. in the front. He had no other questions. Charlie Maintanis: Charlie s8id there are a few things that Zoning does not allow. • Under Section 174-25 (1) (5) allows for an accessory use for a home occupation. • Section 174-25 (1) (2) only one commercial vehicle is allowed, not to exceed a 2 ton capacity. • Section 174-25(H) (1);Any trade, industry or other use that is noxious, offensive, etc. is not allowed in any Zoning District. • Section 174-25 (H) (10) parking or storing construction equipment, etc. is not allowed unless there's a building permit associated with it, and cannot be on the property for more than 30 days. • This property is in the flood zone and would require to meet building code requirements. • Definition "accessory use table", and that the Building Commissioner has been forwarding these projects to the ZBA. • Suggested to the applicant that he could file for a LOMA F to FEMA because the property is in a flood zone. Charlie arid Evan had a conversation regarding the proposal for a detached garage, and the definition of an accessory structure. The new bylaw is pending approval with the Attorney:General, Evan mentioned that this project is not proposing a bedroom, but could potentially become a bedroom in the future.Charlie mentioned that there are other potential uses such as a kitchen, bedroom, and offices that will soon be allowed. Charlie said in his opinion that this application is not in the use table, and does not make it null and void because:of the definition of an accessory building is devoted exclusively for an accessory use to the principal use of the lot for which it is located. Rodney Collins: Mr. Collins said he could have a discussion with Town Counsel to review any questions discussed with the Town Planner and Building Inspector. He believes this is just an application for a one person office. He had no other concerns. Tom Rullo: • Will there be a separate address for the garage?The Attorney said; No • How many employees expected inside the building? The Attorney said; the homeowner only. 2