My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/2020 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
5/21/2020 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2020 1:35:57 PM
Creation date
8/26/2020 1:35:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. Sign expense warrants. It was understood that expense warrants would have to be signed <br /> outside of the meeting, due to there being no Board members physically present at the meeting. <br /> 3. Review of Title V Violations—40 Glenneagle Drive. Mr.Harrington commented that this property <br /> had a septic inspection performed for property transfer on July 16, 2019. Engineering services <br /> were started and, in the process of the reviewing the design, it was noted that the number of <br /> bedrooms did not match what was on record with the Town. The Health Department and <br /> Assessor's records indicated that three bedrooms were in the dwelling. Requests were made to <br /> the Assessor and the Peninsula Council of New Seabury for information relative to any permits or <br /> changes to the dwelling in the past. Floor plans were provided by the contractor who was <br /> representing the owner. A walk-through inspection was performed, during which four primary <br /> bedrooms were observed on the first and second floors. The basement was inspected and three <br /> other rooms with privacy, heat, beds, and no means of egress were observed. <br /> An order letter was sent to the owners on May 12,2020 regarding the basement bedrooms. Ms. <br /> Linn Epstein contacted the Health Department to try to resolve the issue of the basement <br /> bedrooms. Several resolutions were discussed, including modifications for a six-foot cased <br /> opening per our bedroom definition, removing the beds and heat to remove the requirements of <br /> a bedroom, and issuance of a deed restriction so that perspective buyers understand the <br /> restrictions on basement rooms. <br /> Property owners, Linn and Jonathan Epstein, had dialed-in and Chair Baumgaertel invited them <br /> to comment remotely. Ms. Epstein advised the Board that the electric heat had been capped and <br /> disconnected from the panel, and thermostats and all furniture had been removed from the <br /> basement rooms. She stated that the house was for sale and they did not want to incur a lot of <br /> cost to modify the basement. Ms.Warden reiterated the importance of being consistent,and the <br /> Board briefly discussed a similar case with a property on Captains Row that had been renovated <br /> to add basement rooms. Mr. Harrington explained that, in that situation, the property owner <br /> ended up making modifications to reduce number of rooms based on the capacity of the septic. <br /> There was a building permit pulled and extensive renovations were being done at the time. <br /> Ms. Epstein said that they wanted to be transparent and do the right thing, but they don't want <br /> to spend tens of thousands of dollars modifying the rooms. She asked if it would be acceptable if <br /> they disconnected and physically removed the electric baseboard heaters. Mr. Harrington <br /> reminded the Board that the owners are in the process of upgrading from a three to a four <br /> bedroom septic, because there are four primary bedrooms on the first/second floor. Chair <br /> Baumgaertel stated that, if I were a new owner of this property, with the layout,the bathroom, <br /> and the closets currently downstairs,he would seethe potential for them to be used as bedrooms. <br /> He asked if an enforceable agreement would be appropriate and Mr. Harrington answered that <br /> the deed restriction is the better document to use because those get recorded, where the <br /> enforceable agreement is not designed to be recorded. Chair Baumgaertel noted that there was <br /> no feasible way to create a 6' cased opening without removing entire walls, and Mr. Harrington <br /> reminded Board members that,without heat or windows,the rooms did not meet the definition <br /> of a bedroom. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion,Veronica Warden moved to rescind the violation <br /> letter for 40 Glenneagle Drive, dated May 12, 2020, with the following conditions: 1) the <br /> baseboard heating be removed;2)the panel and thermostats that support the electric heating be <br /> removed, and 3) a deed restriction be placed on the property limiting it to four bedrooms. The <br /> deed restriction must be recorded at the Barnstable Registry of Deeds filed and a copy of the <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.