My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/2010 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/19/2010 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 3:14:45 PM
Creation date
10/2/2020 2:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would be predominantly commercial and that the plan had been approved since 1964. Owned by New <br /> Seabury LLC, the economic market will determine when the area will be developed. Mr. Gregg <br /> questioned the agreement about Section S and its intent to be connected to the New Seabury plant if <br /> Mashpee eventually owns the New Seabury plant and asked if the Town would be willing to build another <br /> facility at Keeter if needed and would that be consistent with the agreement. Mr. Gregg suggested that the <br /> group focus on what levels and areas to address prior to dealing with expansion of facilities or details <br /> about level of treatment and relocation of flow. The Chair noted that a cluster may be possible for the <br /> Bright Coves/Summerwood area utilizing a former well-site. The Chair questioned how to address areas <br /> to the west toward South Cape Beach, the Seabrooks and the islands and whether it can be incorporated <br /> into the New Seabury plant or to a new plant at the Keeter property. Mr. Gregg suggested that,when <br /> working toward the islands, to address as much as possible on the mainland which may allow <br /> consideration of other options on the islands or landlocked properties. The Chair expressed concern about <br /> Falmouth adjusting its plans for Seconsett but Mr. Gregg reminded the Commission that towns will <br /> consider their own highest priorities before considering the needs of neighboring towns. Mr. Howes <br /> added that if Mashpee can develop wastewater treatment and control the watershed in Jehu and Hamblin <br /> Ponds, a significant restoration will occur even if the main bay is lagging behind. Additionally, Falmouth <br /> has 14 estuaries which will require planning for what can be controlled completely and fixing Waquoit <br /> will be a large project. Mr. Gregg suggested the possibility that Mashpee may be able to offer a plan to <br /> Falmouth to assist with their wastewater issues. Mr. Howes recommended focusing on prioritization. <br /> Regarding the central area of Mashpee, including the Route 28 corridor to the Riverbend Motel, limited <br /> town land is available other than the schools. The Mashpee Commons treatment area is located in the <br /> middle of the area(highlighted in yellow)with the intent to service their entire project. Additionally, <br /> Windchime Point and South Cape Village have their own treatment plants. The Mashpee Schools will be <br /> added to the service area of the Mashpee Commons treatment plant along with the existing Fire and <br /> Police Station, Senior Center and Library. The Chair questioned whether the plant be expanded to <br /> accommodate additional locations in the area, adding that it is not the best location for discharge due to <br /> the Mashpee River but an effluent discharge pipe or discharging in the area only during the summer may <br /> offer a resolution to the issue. Mr. Howes responded that the concept would be a numbers game <br /> regarding the discharge and would require a significant offset. Mr.Eichner added that if it is removed <br /> from another location, it may be possible to increase the discharge. Mr. Howes suggested that treating the <br /> discharge at a higher level may create a positive effect for the Mashpee River and discouraged moving <br /> outside of the area. The Chair indicated that he was considering a service area between the Quashnet and <br /> Mashpee Rivers that would include Greenwood, Sandalwood,Deer Crossing, the industrial park, <br /> Quashnet Valley, St. Andrews Drive and part of Great Neck Road. <br /> The high density area south of Johns Pond presents a challenge with no attenuation and includes Johns <br /> Pond Estates, Algonquin Avenue, Winslow Farms, Childs River Estates and the trailer park. Mr. Howes <br /> reported that Johns Pond offers a very high quality system. The Chair questioned whether sewering south <br /> of Johns Pond would contribute to cleaning up the Quashnet and Childs River and Mr. Howes agreed. <br /> The state of Childs River was discussed along with the need that both Mashpee and Falmouth share the <br /> responsibility for improving it. Chairman Fudala questioned Falmouth's timeline to address the area and <br /> Mr. Gregg noted that the two towns needed to move forward. Mr. Lombardo stated that Falmouth's <br /> revised plan is located on the Falmouth Citizen's Review website. The Chair questioned where the <br /> wastewater will be directed in the area south of Johns Pond, adding that the only existing plants are the <br /> privately owned Southport and the small high school plant. Additionally, Mashpee Village is building its <br /> own treatment plant and the possibility of oversizing the plant was suggested in order to tie in other <br /> properties. Mr. Howes expressed concerns about the site and the ability to discharge in the area, and <br /> referenced Mr. Gottlieb's suggestion of focusing on regionalization with Falmouth. Mr. Gregg added that <br /> the dense neighborhood located in Falmouth has been identified for a later phase and that it may be <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.