My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/13/2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
01/13/2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2021 9:29:20 AM
Creation date
2/1/2021 9:29:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/13/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JANUARY 13,2021 <br /> Mr. Gould, seconded, yes, <br /> Mr. Blaisdell, yes, <br /> Mr. Reiffarth, yes, <br /> Ms. Bonvie, yes, <br /> Mr. Furbush, yes. <br /> All were in favor to approve the variance relief. <br /> 63 Waterline Drive South: Owner,The 63 Waterline Drive South Nominee Trust, Lewis <br /> H. Robert, Trustee requests a Written Finding under §174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to <br /> replace an existing outdoor pool and patio with a new pool and patio, and construct an <br /> addition to the existing dwelling on property located in and R-3 Zoning District, Map 72 <br /> Parcel 61,Mashpee,MA. (Board to accept a formal withdrawal of Special Permit petition <br /> case no. SP-2020-44 for 63 Waterline Dr. South; opened and heard on November 18, <br /> 2020 that was incorrectly advertised). <br /> Ron made a motion that the Board accept the applicant's withdrawal of a Special Permit <br /> application dated November 18, 2020 for 63 Waterline Drive South without prejudice. The <br /> application and case number SP-2020-44 was incorrectly advertised. Mr. Gould, yes, Mr. <br /> Bonvie,yes,Mr. Goldstein,yes,Mr.Blaisdell,yes, and Mr.Furbush, yes. All were in favor <br /> to accept the withdrawal of the Special Permit application. <br /> Attorney, Mike Ford represented the new hearing for a Written Finding to replace an <br /> existing pool and raised patio around the pool with a screened in porch around the existing <br /> house. The property is in an R-3 Zoning District and is non-conforming with respect to lot <br /> size noted at 15,957 sq. ft. where 40,000 is required. The frontage is 122 ft. and 150 ft. is <br /> required. Lot coverage is 36.7%., where 30% is allowed in this area, but the lot size will <br /> decrease to 36.6%. The project is also non-conforming in terms of the setback from <br /> wetlands. The current setback from the wetlands is 17.3 ft., and there will be a slight <br /> improvement at 17.8 ft. when the new pool is installed, and the patio is replaced. <br /> At the last meeting, in addition to discovering that the petition was incorrectly advertised, <br /> there was a net increase in lot coverage of 48 sq. ft. The Board was very specific that in <br /> this area parcels are already non-conforming in terms of lot coverage, and the Board does <br /> not allow an increase in lot coverage. A new site plan was submitted along with two <br /> renderings depicting the revisions.The setback sketch shows the current setback of 17.3 ft. <br /> from the wetlands, and will become 17.8 ft. which is a slight improvement. The lot <br /> coverage will be reduced by 8 sq. ft. The screened in porch is the only addition to the <br /> building. It will be about 90 sq. ft. in size and is seasonal shown in an area that already has <br /> a raised patio. <br /> This project was approved by the Conservation Commission. The existing pool equipment <br /> is within 20 ft. of the wetlands and was relocated along the side of the house. The Board <br /> can find that this project will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood <br /> than what currently exists. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.