Laserfiche WebLink
aU ylll>I i/ <br /> f <br /> . L I own o :Mashpee Aannina Board <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> follow State Building Codes and 527 CMR Fire Access, they have to do that. He personally won't allow <br /> anything that will inhibit their access to provide safety to the people. <br /> Ms. Cox reiterated the purpose of this plan is to show the zones, and the following details are going to <br /> be worked through. <br /> Mr. Phelan wanted to know if Mr. Chace was committed to what remains in the zoning now. <br /> Mr. Chace noted there are a number of masters here, one is producing affordable and workforce <br /> housing. There is someone sitting somewhere doing the math. The math to be able to pay for <br /> infrastructure improvements, the number of units that we come up with is in that range. We could go <br /> back towards commercial, or institutional, wouldn't it be great to land a regional college. There was <br /> some discussion from 2008 around a college, but the world changed. If that was allowed in the DA we <br /> could go out and rekindle that conversation. The answer is no, we are open to hearing why we should <br /> change a line one way or another. Overall there is a math issue that we have to be aware of. <br /> Mr. Lehrer made a brief comment for Board and Community consideration. The zoning bylaw that's <br /> proposed now breaks out into subzones. Conversations that we should be considering is one of design. <br /> The focus should remain on what the zoning produces by way of density, building type, core, transition, <br /> and edge remaining consistent with desires and needs for the Town, and the design principals being <br /> proposed. With regard to how we process thoughtful impact questions, he feels from a professional and <br /> technical perspective the Board is in a better position with impact questions when we have set <br /> parameters in regards to density. Zoning defines density, we need parameters with people living and <br /> working in this space. <br /> Ms. Waygan is glad Mr. Lehrer brought up design. She has asked for a design book several times, <br /> could it be given? The copy of the map that had been handed out is fuzzy and she cannot understand <br /> without clearer graphics. She sent a message last week that she wanted the design book and a better <br /> regulating plan. Mr. Balzarini and Mr. Phelan would like it too. She cannot give all her comments if she <br /> is provided the materials on the night of the evening of the meeting. At this time she is having a difficult <br /> time forming an opinion because information is lacking. From the first meeting she asked for this. Was <br /> an email sent to their group asking for all of these items? It needs to be addressed. She does not want <br /> to be negative, it's difficult to have these meetings without proper information. <br /> Ms. Cox clarified what she is looking for are the design guidelines. They are in the process of being <br /> prepared. <br /> Mr. Fulone mentioned the special topic for the meeting on July 7t" is lot setbacks, and it would be <br /> helpful to get those ahead of time to formulate thoughtful conversation. It is okay to move topics around <br /> if it is needed. The next three scheduled meetings are July 7t" 21 st and 281. He asked if Ms. Cox could <br /> work with Mr. Lehrer in getting this information ahead of time. <br /> Mr. Chace noted the Friday before the next meeting would be two days from today. Maybe the topic <br /> should be delayed until the following week because they will not be completed. <br /> 5 <br />