My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/30/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
06/30/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2021 5:01:40 PM
Creation date
8/25/2021 10:33:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/30/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,�yrvoy 1 <br /> own of iWashpoe AanniniqBoard <br /> •'1+9'pJ 3 Nt+Slt�/' <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> .Mashpee, .Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Balzarini mentioned the change of topics needing to be advertised to the Public. <br /> Ms. Waygan cannot go forward on any topics without the design guidelines and does not think any <br /> topics are feasible without the regulating plan or design book. She doesn't think it's unreasonable to <br /> pause until materials are received. <br /> Mr. Lehrer thinks the intent of the special topic meetings were to discuss urban design principals and <br /> best practice as they related to the Development Agreement and zoning. This is an educational <br /> opportunity for the Board to understand what dimensional criteria means and then get into more refined <br /> detail in a regulating plan. The intent was to educate on the architectural aspect. <br /> Mr. Phelan would like to take the next meeting as educational and not in regards to the proposal. When <br /> you look at this he is not sure what he is looking at. Education even just for a half hour prior to the <br /> regular meeting would be helpful. <br /> Ms. Cox referenced the submissions prior were aimed to get the zoning bylaw at the next Town <br /> Meeting. That timeline has changed, and a lot of comments she has been hearing from the Board and <br /> Selectmen are more about process and less about language. Does it make sense to continue on with <br /> the schedule that we previously proposed or should we take a pause and get further along in the DA <br /> then re-sequence zoning? <br /> Mr. Balzarini and Ms. Waygan like that idea. <br /> Mr. Fulone struggles in thinking about a DA without zoning. How do you put together a thoughtful DA <br /> not knowing what zoning is going to provide? Building this plan and then having to go back and try to <br /> retrofit into zoning, he struggles with that, but running parallel paths makes sense. The Planning Board <br /> and Selectmen have made it clear, we won't ask residents to vote without DA in place. If we want to <br /> use the next several meetings as educational, he is fine with that. <br /> Ms. Cox reiterated the main focus of this Board is zoning and the Development Agreement. We could <br /> catch up a little more with the process until we get into the nifty gritty of the DA. <br /> Mr. Balzarini would like to see this work together. <br /> Ms. Waygan thinks zoning is so far ahead, she is having trouble understanding and not even seeing <br /> pieces or plots makes it more difficult. <br /> Mr. Fulone corrected that the Board only has a draft of a bylaw that hasn't been agreed on, there is no <br /> bylaw yet, there hasn't been anything done on zoning except reading a proposed bylaw. To say the <br /> zoning is way ahead of the DA, it isn't. <br /> Mr. Lehrer wants to add the dimensions and density to the 21st meeting to allow more time to produce <br /> the design guidelines. If they aren't in then there can be more on urban development. Follow through <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.