My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/09/2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
12/09/2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2023 12:08:02 PM
Creation date
11/4/2021 4:13:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/09/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MEETING MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 9, 2020 <br /> <br />Mr. Gould second, yes, <br />Mr. Blaisdell, yes, <br />Mr. Bonvie, yes, <br />Mr. Goldstein, yes, <br />Mr. Furbush, yes. <br />All were in favor of the Written Finding application. <br /> <br />31 Birch Way: Owners, Gary J. and Denise M. Nagle request a Written Finding under <br />§174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for reconstruction and expansion of an existing <br />deck, and second story balcony on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 27 <br />Parcel 86, Mashpee, MA. <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Cook, Cotuit Bay Design represented the homeowners for their deck <br />reconstruction project. The site plan shows a dashed line towards the North of the existing <br />patio and where the deck will extend 18 ft. The corner of the deck is 11.4 ft. to the property <br />line, and the new deck will be 11.9 ft. which is not getting any closer to the northerly <br />property line than what exists. The deck will be extending over the existing patio, and the <br />steps will be removed. The plan also shows the deck and wooden walkway toward the <br />inland bank of Mashpee Pond. The existing balcony on the northerly side will be extended <br />10.4 ft. and is not getting any closer to the property line. <br /> <br />This project is in the process of being scheduled with the Conservation Commission. Mr. <br />Cook said he spoke to Charlie, Building Inspector regarding the project, and told him the <br />distance of the new deck to the edge of the water is 55 ft. The plan shows a very steep <br />topography, with the elevation of the house at 85.3 ft. The top of the inland bank is <br />elevation 80 ft., and the deck is approximately 4.5 ft. higher. The distance is currently 55 <br />ft. from any wetlands, and will be extending approximately 17 ft. on the existing patio <br />which consists of pavers. <br /> <br />Sharon read the Conservation comments into the record which will require a permit filing <br />with the Conservation Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Furbush polled the Board asking their comments. Mr. Gould will not approve the <br />Conservation prevue. Mr. Blaisdell will move <br />forward with a condition upon Conservation approval, and a building permit will not be <br />issued without Conservation approval. Sharon abstained. Jim Reiffarth agrees that <br />Conservation should approve it first. Scott Goldstein agrees to move forward, and if <br />, and a change is made the project would need to go back <br />to the ZBA. But if the Board approves it conditioned upon as the plan as drawn, he does <br />not have an issue. Mr. Bonvie mentioned the current pandemic situation, and said that a <br />motion could be made subject to Conservation approval, that any changes to the plan would <br />require the applicant to go back to the Board for approval. Mr. Gould is willing to <br />compromise. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.