08/14/2013 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Arthur Burdick 47 Quaker Run Road(Map 90 Parcel 43) Mashpee,MA 02649 FINDING-2013-24 There were no comments from abutters. General Finding: The subject property located at 47 Quaker Run Road consists of approximately 14,560 square feet. Written Finding Criteria: §174-17. Continuance; Extensions; Alterations - Lawfully created structures or uses may be continued, although not conforming to the provisions of this chapter. Non-conforming single- or two-family dwelling structures may be changed, extended or altered if such change, extension or alteration complies with the dimensional requirements applicable to the lot under current provisions of§174-31 or, for lots which have been developed pursuant to §174-21, complies with such requirements as were applicable to initial construction of the dwelling under provisions of §174-21. Changes, extensions or alterations of non-conforming single- or two-family dwelling structures which do not meet the applicable dimensional requirements as set forth above, and changes, extensions or alterations of all other non-conforming structures, or non-conforming uses, may not be made unless there is a written finding by the Board of Appeals that such change,extension or alteration shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure or use to the neighborhood and that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks as may be required. Although said finding shall not constitute a special permit as defined by the general laws and this by-law, the Board of Appeals shall follow the procedures specified in the general laws for special permits in processing requests for such findings. For the purposes hereof, compliance with dimensional requirements shall be determined by the Inspector of Buildings. History:Amended 10-4-1993 ATM,Article 24,approved by Attorney General 10-18-1993. History:Amended 10-17-2005 ATM,Article 22,approved by Attorney General 3-7-2006. Specific Written Findings: The Board determined the proposal shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure or use to the neighborhood, as defined under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws, and contingent upon the following: F r l 2