Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> by the PI Board. [conditions for approval may include plans to be submitted for the Cape Cod <br /> Commission, Mr. Fudala stated that the design for the rotary would need to occur now but Mr. Cannon stated <br /> that it has always been a condition included with the decision. Mr. Cannon described the Cape Cod <br /> Commission DBI conditions for a building pennx include roadway plans and occupancy permits that may <br /> require implementation of the plans. Board members discussed previously submitted proposals for the rotary. <br /> The Chair recommended that the Mate be contacted regarding the viability of the ti-afic study s scope of work. <br /> Mr.Balza questioned what would happen if the Mate did not support an.intersectioni,at Steeple Street and <br /> Mr. Fudala stated that people have a right to access their property. Mr. Cannon added that the Mate rarely <br /> discourages traffic.si as long their necessity has been proven. Mr. Bal arini expressed concern about <br /> traffic backing p u at:the rotary.and Ir. Fudala noted that traffic tends to get backed up at:the red lights prior to <br /> the rotary. fir. Cannon questioned developing a separate scope of work for the rotary. <br /> Chaff man Waygan expressed concern regarding a potentially dangerous intersection located at-the intersection <br /> Of Steeple Street and,Yobs Fishing Road. The-Chair reported cars ta k;img a"left from-1 1 end up facing cars <br /> travelingtoward 11 and that `ng spaces along.the Mashpee Commons green and increased traffic entering <br /> p� <br /> the library create a saf issue. Mr.Fudala asked Mr. Cannon to add the intersection to the trafFc study. It <br /> was suggested that the intersection may r quim removal of the spaces and improved. ignag . M - <br /> Fudala noted that the Planning Board never approved the puking spaces or the configuration of the intersection. <br /> Mr. Cannon will have the intersection addressed. <br /> Mr. Fudalaprovided Mr. Gannon with a scope of work for the hiring of a Planning Board consultant. The,Chair <br /> recommended that it be.confirmed that the new Masbpee Commons plans are being utilized'for the traffic study <br /> since the number of housing units have changed. Mr. Cannon wit! confirm-th t the new plans are being utilized- <br /> W. Cannon noted that if the traffic study estimates too much traffic by reducing the plans, it vAll result in more <br /> mitigation. Should structures be added,the uu is study would need to be completed again_ <br /> Mr- Fudala referenced-the RFP and the scope of services for the Planning Board's traffic consultant. 11r. <br /> Fudala read the sermon located on page 5 of the document regarding the areas that the PI Board's <br /> consultant should review on behalf of the Board,including future.land needs for rotary 'improvements. Board <br /> members discussed the possibility of residents who urpp rt maintaining the rotary is. Mr. Kooharian- <br /> uestion d the availabilityof laps for the rotary and Mr. tenon responded,that there are conceptual plans <br /> available. Mr. Cannon suggested incorporating-s me-ofthe Planning Boards language into � scope of <br /> work. Mr. Fudala questioned harwould be needed to be considered for the#`TIP." Mr. Cannon stated that <br /> conceptual plans have been developed for the r t ry showing.reconfigurations of the rotary. Mr. FudaJa <br /> � P i � . <br /> suggested that,all r options s be considered among the.traffic consultants and the DPW I n order to id entify <br /> � rotary . <br /> anagreeableoption- Mr. Cannon reVonded that the pr would then enter a design phase and <br /> 100% would be needed in order to be considered by the state for the TIP. Additionally, majority support from <br /> 1la.shpee endorses the project would be needed in orderr for the sateto fund a project. lair. Fudala stated hi <br /> � <br /> preference to work the discussion into the development agreement. Mr. Cannon recommended worldng the <br /> i cussion into the scope of with . The Chair eWhasi ed that the Board had requested <br /> discussion p <br /> that the rotary and the entiall dangerous intersection be considered and Board members were in agreement <br /> that it be-included in the scope of work. Mr- won si geaed that a preferred alternative be developed for the <br /> rot b the Mash Commons traffic c o and %, %and 100%design plans could be required in. <br /> .. y � <br /> the final development agreement. Mr. Fudala suggested that everyone be at the table to discuss the plans and <br /> Mr. Petersen agreed that feedback from the parties involved would be neces&nary for rotary plans. Mr. Cannon <br /> the consultants would work toward erred * e but the Board would lay out the number of <br /> stated that P� <br /> public meetings that would be requk . Mr. Cannon noted that concept level designs are not overly expensive <br /> he developer but that loo°/o of design planscould be a significant amount of money, possibly $l million for <br /> tot p <br /> the rotary. Mr. Cannon added that the NfawsachusetLs Ifighway Dqnrtment will require a % design public <br /> hearing. <br /> 3 <br />