Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Board of Appeals <br />Minutes <br />June 27, 2006 <br />(3) A lean-to inside parking area is proposed along Front Street that would <br />be consistent with the Mashpee Commons design to alleviate a "parking to <br />parking" scenario as the unit abuts the Homeyer Village parking area. <br />Mr. Rowley made note of his concern regarding the inside lean-to <br />proposal on LA -24-24 Front Street as it relates to the egress of vehicles at <br />the subject site comer location. <br />(4) The small green previously located in the center of Meeting Street has <br />been eliminated from the design proposal. The green area has been <br />relocated to the front of buildings 127/133 and buildings 121 and 122a on <br />both sides of the street to create more of a buffer and to improve vehicle <br />movement and flow. <br />(5) The amended design modifies building 121, 122a and 122b and <br />improves parking to support residential uses. Garden Lane is now a <br />pedestrian only connection to better serve the area residents. The <br />pedestrian paths will not be paved roadways. Mr. Rowley indicated the <br />parking to the rear of building 121 it very tight. Twenty-four feet is <br />• typical between parking aisles. <br />(6) The retail/office space in building 121 has been reduced to 1,300 <br />square feet. The commercial space will only be along Jobs Fishing Road. <br />(7) Lot 66, initially of high density has been reconfigured in the design <br />plan. The units and commercial space have also been reduced. Four <br />townhouses and two live work units are proposed in place of 12 units. <br />The commercial space is reduced from 6,320 to 2,400 square feet. The <br />commercial space is not shown as part of the live work unit totals. This is <br />a reduction of 5,770 commercial square feet in total. Mr. Rowley asked <br />about the garage lot, 66b & 66c as it pertains to access and limited width. <br />It was noted that all garages would access from a lane and not a street. The <br />matter was taken under advisement. Final subdivision plans would be <br />provided to the Board in greater detail to address this concern. <br />(8) To conform to density, lot 1 was modified to reflect three units <br />opposed to eight. (9) Twelve townhouses have been incorporated into the <br />proposed design in place of 5 single family homes along Broad Street in <br />an effort to better situate the makeup of the intended homes around the <br />green area of the design plan. <br />• (10) Along Fountain Street, two duplexes are proposed in place of two sets <br />of three townhouses. <br />