My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/14/2004 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
07/14/2004 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 5:05:57 PM
Creation date
2/10/2022 2:28:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning Paul and Helen Zammito 2 <br /> Board of Appeals V-04-80 <br /> Robert Nelson seconds the motion. Mr. Regan votes in favor. Mr. Guerrera votes in <br /> favor. So moved. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority must <br /> determine that there are circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape or topography <br /> which affect the subject property and not the district in which it is located; that a literal <br /> enforcement of the By-laws would involve substantial hardship to the Petitioner; that <br /> desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and <br /> without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the By-law. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject property is located at 4 Spoondrift Circle and contains 21,200 <br /> square feet upon completion of combining lots 136 and 104B. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that; <br /> 1. the circumstances relating to the unusual shape and sloping topography affect <br /> the subject property and not the district in which it is located; therefore, a <br /> literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the Petitioner. <br /> 2. the subject property is impacted by wetlands; therefore,without relief the <br /> property could not be used for a residence, the purpose for which it had been <br /> laid out and for which the balance of the undersized parcels in the subdivision <br /> were being used. <br /> 3. installation of a new septic system is an improvement to the subject property; <br /> therefore, relief may be granted without detriment to the public good. <br /> 4. the property has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records and is subject to betterments from the Water District; therefore, relief <br /> may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without <br /> nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the By- <br /> law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.