02/28/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—February 29, 2001 3 Board of Appeals Chilton Development Inc. - Requests a Special Permit under Section 174-25.I.9 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to modify and maintain an existing pier, ramp and float on Popponesset Creek on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 128 Waterway (Map 105 Block 232) Mashpee, MA. Sitting: James E. Regan III, Richard T. Guerrera and Frederick R. Borgeson. I Mr. Michael Grotzke from The Phoenix Group represented the Petition and stated that the ZBA approved a dock on the subject property in 1993 or 1994. A waterways license was issued in 1993. Plans call for modification of the existing structure by extending the dock. The total length will be under the allowed 70-foot length limit. i Mr. Grotzke stated that the Conservation Commission, Harbormaster and Shellfish Constable have approved the proposal. No comments were received from abutters. Mr. Borgeson moved to grant the Special Permit, subject to findings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and with reference to the 1993/1994 Special Permit. Mr. Guerrera seconded. All agreed. f' CONTINUED BEARINGS I I iI Chilton Development Company, Inc.—Requests a Special Permit under Sections 174-17 j and 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to demolish an existing dwelling and construct a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 138 Waterway(Map 105 Block 234)Mashpee, MA. Continued from January 10, 2001 Public Hearings to allow for Conservation Commission approval. Sitting: James E. Regan III, Richard T. Guerrera and Frederick R. Borgeson. Mr. Michael Grotzke of the Phoenix Group represented the Petition and stated that plans call for demolition of the existing structure and construction of a new home on the subject property. The Conservation Commission has approved the proposal. The Board discovered that the Petitioner needs a Variance from the lot coverage requirements. Mr. Grotzke said that the lot pre-dates zoning and he thought that the lot did not have to meet current lot coverage requirements. Mr. Wheeler stated that the Petitioner does need a Variance from the ZBA to exceed the lot coverage. The Board agreed that doing so would be a protection for the homeowner. l I No comments were received from abutters. Mr. Borgeson moved to grant the Special Permit to allow for demolition, subject to findings 1, 4, 5, 6. Mr. Guerrera seconded. All agreed. The Board reminded Mr. i