10/24/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—October 24, 2001 5 Board of Appeals & Islands Engineering represented the Petitions and stated that he made in error in calculating the proposed lot coverage. The lot coverage would be 21.8%, not 23.9%. i � In light of recent correspondence sent to the Board, Mr. Nelson said that he wanted to state for the record that"at no time did I ever oppose the removal of the existing structure". Mr. Govoni read letters from Mr. David Foley and Ms. Maryclare Himmel in opposition ; III to grant of Variance relief from the lot coverage requirements. i Mr. Brem said that he was in favor of demolition of the existing home as long as the j proposal complies with the 20% lot coverage requirements. He stated that the Petitioner has not established hardship to allow for Variance relief Calculations reveal that if only 97 square-feet were removed from the proposal, it would comply with the 20% lot coverage requirements. Mr. Sanicki said that removal of that amount of square footage j on a small lot translates into a"big change". li Mr. Thomas O'Neill, architect for the he roJect said that he is willing to work with the i Board. He said that the existing 5-bedroom home is cramped and the basement is leaking. The Board made several suggestions on how to reduce lot coverage. Building ! IIj Commissioner Russell W. Wheeler said that setbacks in that area are 25 feet in the front and 15 feet on sides and rear. i Mr. Edward Mahoney, President of the Popponesset Beach Association, claimed that he is the only year-round resident of Uncatena Road. He said that Mr. Foley lives two streets away from the subject property. Mr. Sanicki said that the proposal would meet the height requirements. ! Mr. Govoni moved to Deny the request for Variance relief from 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws; therefore, the proposal must not exceed the 20% allowed lot coverage. Mr. Govoni moved to grant a Variance of 21 feet from 174-33 of the Zoning By-laws. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. i Mr. Govoni moved to grant the Special Permit. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. The j Variance and Special Permit are subject to submission of a revised plan showing that the ro osal complies with the lot coverage requirements. p p p g Inc —Requests a Variance from Section 174-26 of the Dream Developers of Cape Cod Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the Growth Management requirements to allow for construction of a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 693 Great Neck Road South (Map 104 Parcel 124) Mashpee, MA. i I i I