My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/10/1993 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
03/10/1993 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 1:25:26 PM
Creation date
3/14/2022 1:25:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Appeals Minutes - March 10, 1993 3. <br />i� <br />James T. and Judith E. Conery - Request a Special Permit under <br />Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to expand <br />a non -conforming dwelling with a house addition in an R-3 <br />zoning district on property located at 17 Russell Road (Map <br />120, Block 90) Mashpee, MA. <br />James T. and Judith E. Conery - Request a variance from <br />Section 174-31 for permission to vary the setback requirements <br />in an R-3 zoning. district on property located at 17 Russell <br />Road (Map 120, Block 90) Mashpee, MA. <br />Members sitting: J. Friel, M. Makunas, C. Hawver <br />Engineer John Slavinsky represented the applicants and <br />questioned if a Special Permit and variance were necessary. <br />Mr. Makunas commented that this is a stand alone lot and the <br />zoning froze when it became a stand alone lot. The lot was <br />created prior to zoning and he thought neither a Special <br />Permit nor a Variance was required. He suggested that the <br />Board issue a determination that they are not required. Mr. <br />Hauck said he was going to ask that Board review things that <br />were closer than 10' to the sideline, more than 20% lot <br />• coverage and closer than 20' to road for a Special Permit so <br />that it is reviewed that it is not more detrimental to the <br />neighborhood. Mr. Makunas said this would be a safeguard. <br />Mr. Makunas suggested that Mr. Hauck use the minimum zoning <br />which was 7 1/2' sideline setback and he agreed. <br />Mr. Makunas moved that the Board has determined that this is a <br />pre-existing stand alone lot and that the applicants' <br />dimensions are conforming and that no Special Permit or <br />Variance is required. Ms. Hawver seconded. All agreed. <br />Gordon Weeks - Mr. Weeks said he was planning to reapply but <br />would review his plans with Windchime residents before filing. <br />Mr. Friel said he had visited the site and said some trees <br />need to be removed from the driveway. Mr. Hauck asked about <br />concerns from Greg Taylor, the DPW Director and Mr. Makunas <br />agreed that this should be reviewed. <br />Mark Gildea - Mr. Gildea reviewed a lot in Summersea of pork <br />chop shape with 10' frontage which has been carried as a <br />buildable lot and Mr. Hauck questioned if it is buildable. He <br />presented plans of the Planning Board subdivision approval in <br />1965. Mr. Hauck said it was outside of the New Seabury <br />Special Permit and said that regardless of what the Planning <br />Board approved if the lot does not meet zoning it is not <br />buildable. Mr. Gildea said that the Planning Board can waive <br />• some zoning requirements. Mr. Makunas said that the concern <br />on frontage was for safety. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.