Laserfiche WebLink
There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to continue the review of <br /> the septic design plan for 12 Popponesset Island Road to the next meeting. Motion seconded by <br /> Ernest Virgilio. Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio (yes); Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). <br /> VOTE: Unanimous(3-0). <br /> 5. Review of Septic Design Plan—278 Meetinghouse Road. Mrs. Willander commented that, this <br /> dwelling and direct abutters on either side (286 and 268) are serviced by potable wells.The local <br /> regulation requires a 150'setback to any potable well and the plan shows only 100'.There should <br /> be an existing leach pit labelled on the site plan. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel commented that there should be an exact benchmark on the design plan.The <br /> setback should meet the local regulation of 150'. The inlet and outlet Ts should be added. Mr. <br /> Virgilio inquired about the existing tank and a confirmation for the number of bedrooms on the <br /> property. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel requested more time to review the design plan and provide comments for the <br /> design plan. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to continue eview of the <br /> septic design plan for 278 Meetinghouse Road to the next meeting. Motion seconded by Ernest <br /> Virgilio. Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio (yes); Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). VOTE: <br /> Unanimous(3-0). <br /> 6. Review of Septic Design Plan—294 Mashpee Neck Road. Mrs.Willander commented that a final <br /> approved plan needs land surveyor stamp in addition to engineer/designer. Ms. Willander <br /> inquired whether the site plan should show a 10' setback from the water line. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel confirmed that there should be a 10' setback from the water line. He further <br /> commented that the soil absorption system is partially in the driveway and the venting is missing. <br /> A riser is required for the distribution box and should be drawn on the plan. The separation from <br /> the garage to the leach field needs to be determined, and whether it is a slab.Chair Baumgaertel <br /> and Ernie Virgilio were concerned about mechanically compacted soil stated on the design plans <br /> and should most likely have crushed stone. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel requested more time to review the design plan and provide comments. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to continue the review of <br /> the septic design plan for 294 Mashpee Neck Road to the next meeting. Motion seconded by <br /> Ernest Virgilio. Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio (yes); Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). <br /> VOTE: Unanimous(3-0). <br /> Review of Septic Design Plan — 32 Meadow Haven Drive. Chair Baumgaertel requested more <br /> time to review the design plan and provide comments. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to continue the review of <br /> the septic design plan for 32 Meadow Haven Drive to the next meeting. Motion seconded by <br /> Ernest Virgilio. Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio (yes); Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). <br /> VOTE: Unanimous(3-0). <br /> 7. Chair Baumgaertel looked for a motion to add the review of septic design plan for 19 Coombs <br /> Lane to the agenda due to the time constraints for Title V for approval. <br />