My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/15/2021 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
04/15/2021 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2023 5:01:00 PM
Creation date
1/24/2023 11:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/15/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Motion seconded by Kripani Patel. Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio (yes); Kripani Patel (yes); Brian <br /> Baumgaertel (yes). VOTE: Unanimous(3-0). <br /> 6. Review of request for Food Code variance—17 Steeple Street. Mr. Harrington commented that <br /> the owner of Siena Restaurant has requested a variance from the Food Code to allow a newly <br /> proposed exterior container bar to operate with no running hot water. This is more specifically <br /> related to the hand sink and the minimum required 100 degree hot water temperature. An option <br /> was presented by Board of Health staff that the water tank could have an electric heater to warm <br /> the water to the minimum temperature in the similar fashion that the mobile food trucks have. <br /> It would only supply five gallons of water at a time, but it would meet the Code. Mr. Harrington <br /> also advised the Board that there is no 3-bay sink proposed for the container bar, because all of <br /> the glassware and dishware would go back to the commercial washer in the main restaurant. <br /> Graham Silliman, owner and applicant, introduced himself for the record. He argued various <br /> points relative to the logistics challenges and costs of bringing a hot-water hand-wash sink to the <br /> proposed container bar. He further argued that, in other places around the world, where <br /> sanitation standards are lower due to lack of clean/hot water supply, etc., establishments still <br /> operate hygienically and safely with no adverse consequences. He reviewed the specifications of <br /> the various self-contained cold-water hand-wash units he was considering for use in the container <br /> bar, but had not yet settled on an exact unit. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that the Board has never received a request like this before,therefore, has <br /> never granted this type of variance. Because this is not a temporary food set-up, and the hand <br /> sink is proposed to be used for more than 14 days in a season, it must meet the 100 degree hot <br /> water temperature requirement. <br /> Mr. Silliman stated that he intends to supplement with hand sanitizer. Chair Baumgaertel <br /> responded that there is no substitute for hot water and proposed that, once every couple of <br /> hours, the bartenders could be given an opportunity to use a hot-water hand sink inside the <br /> restaurant. Mr. Silliman stated that he saw this as a simple, rugged option that can operate day- <br /> in/out, and one that will be used appropriately by employees. With respect to water heaters, he <br /> expressed concerns about water pressure, since the establishment is not hooked up to Town <br /> water. <br /> After a great deal of deliberation, Board members were in agreement that a hot water hand sink <br /> is an essential component any food service establishment, and that alternative methods of <br /> complying with that requirement of the Food Code needed to be explored by the applicant. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Ernest Virgilio moved to continue the matter of <br /> the request for a variance from the Food Code until the applicant has explored and is prepared to <br /> discuss other options. Motion seconded by Kripani Patel. Roll call vote: Ernest Virgilio (yes); <br /> Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). VOTE: Unanimous(3-0). <br /> 7. Review of request for Title V variance—36 Summersea Road. Mr. Harrington commented that <br /> a septic inspection was performed at this property by Scott Campbell on March 2, 2021. The <br /> septic tank and distribution box were identified as being H-10 loading under the driveway and, <br /> therefore,subject to vehicle loading. The inspection report result was a"Conditional Pass." If the <br /> tank and d-box are replaced, the property will pass Title V and be in compliance with the BOH <br /> Septic Inspection Regulation; however, the current owner is not able to make repairs and the <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.