11/08/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 8,2023 The Board wanted clarification of the "open space" area that is part of another lot that extends further back from the proposed parcel, noted as Lot 6. There is a property line that runs in the middle and depicts a notation as the "bulk storage area". Attorney Kirrane stated that this bulk storage area was originally proposed for just dirt and sand, but based on the recommendations provided by the Director of Community Development at the Plan Review meeting;that was not an acceptable surface, and will now be covered with gravel. The area noted as Lot 6 is not part of this proposal, and will have a post and rail fence along the property line with specific signage. Attorney Kirrane confirmed for the record that Mr. Pesce reviewed and provided his report dated October 26, 2023 of the Landscape Plan, and Photometric Lighting Plan, and was satisfied with the revisions. The Board confirmed that a sign location was noted on the plan, but will require Design Review when a proposal is submitted. Acting Chair, Ms. Sangeleer asked for further comments. Mr. Blaisdell read the Board of Health comments dated November 2, 2023 into the record; "No comment". Mr. Goldstein read the Conservation Department comments dated November 2, 2023 into the record; "Not within wetland jurisdiction". Mr. Reidy read the Assistant Conservation Agent comments dated November 2, 2023 into the record; "The plan for SD Evergreen Circle protects the conservation open space with the infiltration basin in the back, open space signage, and the fence along the open space property lines. Plantings are appropriate in the case of changes to planting location or selection contact conservation for review. " Mr. Furbush read the comments submitted by Evan Lehrer October 24,2023 into the record; "The plans submitted satisfactorily address my concerns. I was concerned in PR that the westerly portion of the lot that was proposed to remain vacant showed no intended use and no treatment such as with pavement or with loam and seed. Given the plan did not show an intended use I recommended that the plan show loaming and seeding of that portion of the lot. The resubmitted plan prescribes a use for that portion of the lot as excess storage/parking. I have no issues with this so long as it's construction and storm water measures are demonstrated to be consistent with the requirements of the zoning bylaw. " Attorney Kirrane confirmed that the recommendations by Mr. Lehrer were revised and confirmed by Mr. Pesce. Ms. Sangeleer read the recommendations submitted by the Plan Review Committee dated September 19, 2023 into the record: -The open space parcel should have rebar set at appropriate locations along the property boundary with caps and signs indicating open space parcel do not disturb. 6