Laserfiche WebLink
"squishy" area, and the area between the existing rock wall and the proposed vertical wall <br /> would be better protection to the property in general. <br /> • The Commissioner states the difference in the location of the vertical wall between the <br /> licensed plan and submitted proposed plan. He requests clarification for the discrepancy. <br /> o A survey of the site was completed, which showed the existing fence is a couple <br /> of feet shy from the property line. Therefore, the proposed plan reflects what is <br /> currently on the site. <br /> • Clarification is requested on the reasoning as to why the construction access roadway is <br /> on the plan? <br /> o The representative details the process and method for building the wall and the <br /> process for anchoring the barge. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> There are no public comments. <br /> AGENT COMMENTS <br /> - The agent inquires about the deteriorating piling holding up the pier and whether it will <br /> be replaced. Mr. Borselli confirms that replacing the piling is part of the plan to rebuild <br /> the walkway. <br /> - The agent also brings up the need to discuss the details required for upland access and <br /> asks about material storage procedures. Mr. Borselli is unable to provide an answer and <br /> suggests that the contractor should clarify this. <br /> - It's noted that the existing stone seawall and pier are licensed Ch. 91 structures (license# <br /> 13541). The proposed replacement bulkhead must undergo review by Ch. 91 following <br /> the issuance of an order of conditions. <br /> - The plan includes a new bulkhead proposed just seaward of the existing stone seawall. <br /> The existing stone wall and proposed bulkhead will be backfilled with clean fill. <br /> - There's a need for more details on the area of bulkhead returns where the proposed wall <br /> meets with abutting properties. <br /> The Agent recommends close and issue with the following conditions: <br /> 1) All construction work, materials, and equipment storage to be conducted from <br /> the water, with no upland construction access or staging within 75' upland of <br /> the saltmarsh. <br /> 2) Incorporate any comments from the Division of Marine Fisheries into the <br /> local order of conditions. <br /> ❖ Further discussion took place, leading to the decision to ask for a continuance. <br /> ➢ Board of Health: Note the location of the septic system and restrict equipment/vehicle <br /> traffic over non-load bearing (H-10) components. Access to septic components must be <br /> maintained. <br /> ➢ Building: No comment. <br /> 11 <br />