08/14/2024 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2024 6. The Board finds that the proposed project under §174-17 and §174-33 is not substantially more detrimental than the pre-existing, nonconforming structure or use to either the Town or the neighborhood. Mr. Blaisdell second, yes, Mr. Furbush, yes, Mr. Goldstein, yes, Mr. Reidy, yes, Mr. Bonvie, yes. All were in favor to issue a Written Finding. 71 Hooppole Road: Petitioner, Strong Tree Engineering LLC requests a Special Permit under §174-17.1 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze a pre-existing,nonconforming structure, and replace it with a new single-family structure and accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 57, Parcel 45, Mashpee, MA. (Owners of Record: Steven K. Cayer and Allison E. Cayer). (Received letter from applicant requesting a continuance until August 28, 2024 hearings). Mr. Milbury read the email request from Mr. Cayer to continue the hearing to allow time to submit revised building plans. He requested a continuance until August 28, 2024 hearings. Chairman Bonvie asked for a motion to accept the request. Mr. Blaisdell, so moved. Mr. Reidy second. All were in favor. 6 Kanter Way: Owner, Martha J. Kanter requests a Written Finding under §174-17 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for construction of a second story to a pre-existing,nonconforming detached garage, with a deck, stairs, and landing off the garage on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 119, Parcel 1B, Mashpee, MA. Attorney Christopher Kirrane represented the homeowner for the Written Finding request to alter a pre-existing, nonconforming detached garage. There is an existing single-family dwelling on the lot,but there is no proposed construction on this dwelling.The proposal consists of adding a second story, and a set of stairs to access that second story of the garage. This garage is located in the R3 Zoning District. There are two nonconforming conditions; the lot size is nonconforming at 18,039 sq. ft., and the front yard setback is currently 15.6 ft., where 40 ft. is required. The stairs will be located on the left side of the garage and will become a conforming condition. The front yard setback will remain nonconforming because the construction consists of creating a second story. The lot coverage is currently 11.1% and will increase to 11.9% which well under the 20% allowed for lots located in the R-3 Zoning District. The proposal is modest and is consistent with other redevelopment in the neighborhood. 7