Laserfiche WebLink
The Agent recommends the addition of two notations: <br /> 1. Adding the total lot square footage to the plan. <br /> 2. Adding to the project narrative, a statement stating, as a result of the <br /> grading it will not exacerbate runoff onto the northernly property. <br /> Motion made by Mr. Weeden for a negative determination pending the assurance from <br /> the engineer that 10% of the lot will be vegetated and the contour levels will not exacerbate the <br /> stormwater runoff. This motion is seconded by Ms. Clapprood. No further discussion. <br /> • ROLL CALL: Mr. O'Neil (Yes), Mr. Weeden (Yes), Ms. Clapprood <br /> (Yes), Mr. Dalton (Yes), Mr. Colombo (Yes) <br /> The motion passes unanimously. <br /> Documents provided: 8/22/22 "Site Plan." <br /> :0 <br /> RDA <br /> 50 Alma Rd, Lori A. & Michael McKenna. Proposed septic system upgrade. Rep.- <br /> Engineering Works, Inc. <br /> Peter McEntee presents a proposal for an updated leaching system to replace a failed 1500- <br /> gallon septic system situated at the rear of the site. He mentions that there are no wetland <br /> resources within 100 feet of the site, and the property falls within an AE flood zone with an <br /> elevation of 10. Mr. McEntee clarifies that no variances are being sought from the Board of <br /> Health. He informs the Commission that the leaching field previously relied on gravity feed due <br /> to its proximity to groundwater, but a pump chamber has now been installed to elevate it and <br /> achieve the required 5-foot separation. This new septic system is designed to be low profile, <br /> necessitating minimal changes in grading. <br /> COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS <br /> Ms. Clapprood asks for the square footage of the dwelling, but the representative of the <br /> applicants is not aware of this information. <br /> Mr. Colombo asks about the reasoning behind not using a denitrification system. In <br /> response, Mr. McEntee explains that the proposed system complies with all the necessary <br /> requirements outlined in the current Title V regulations. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> There are no public comments. <br /> AGENT COMMENTS <br /> 4 <br />