Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> NOVEMBER 9,2022 <br /> Mr. Feronti mentioned that there has been a lot of productive conversations with Mr. Pesce <br /> considering how much is involved with the plans. Mr. Pesce will be providing inspections and <br /> progress reports for the Board. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell said that part of the motion would be a condition based on Mr. Pesce's current and <br /> future recommendations. <br /> Mr. Pesce asked if there was a value or an escrow account documented in the Comprehensive <br /> Permit for engineering services. <br /> Mr. Feronti said that there is no specific value, but it does stipulate that Mashpee Commons pays <br /> for those services. He suggested to the Board that an amount of $10,000 be provided for the <br /> engineering services. The $5,000 threshold will be held for inspections so when the $10,000 goes <br /> down to $2,500,he will replenish the amount to $5,000. <br /> Ms. Sangeleer read the comments from Fire Chief Phelan into the record; "I met with <br /> representatives from Mashpee Commons and the Civil Engineer in September to discuss road <br /> layouts,hydrant locations, access, and turning radiuses. Mashpee Commons submitted an updated <br /> revised plan, and I am satisfied with the proposal as presented." <br /> Mr. Pesce addressed the Board and provided a brief introduction, and discussed his initial <br /> comments that he provided in writing to the Board. He spent time with the Mr. Kuchar regularly <br /> in the last 30 days and as recently as that week to go over some of his initial comments. He <br /> reviewed the plans, and the storm water analysis and made some changes that they all agreed to <br /> that was not included in his letter. During that meeting, he also got some information regarding <br /> the waste water capacity. He reviewed the lighting plan and other related items. Mr. Feronti <br /> provided Mr. Pesce a link to the application package that was submitted to the Board. He has not <br /> thoroughly reviewed the construction mitigation plans, but has reviewed the waste water, and <br /> parking analysis. <br /> Mr. Pesce wanted to confirm the amount 2.4 parking spaces required for off-street parking, and <br /> 246 provided,and the 127 units in section I through D. Mr. Feronti said that there is actually 179 <br /> units in Phase 1. In order to accurately demonstrate the parking is sufficient for the entire Phase, <br /> the spreadsheet will demonstrate the units that are already built depicting the residential units. and <br /> commercial spaces. For those that are not built yet,there is a program for those buildings that were <br /> discussed in 2015-2016 with the ZBA. Those spaces are actually setup if there are commercial <br /> spaces, 25% are allocated for each of the four types of commercial space that could be retail, <br /> residential,office or service business.Each one of those four uses has its own parking requirement. <br /> The 344 spaces includes the on-street spaces as well. The Comprehensive Permit requirement is <br /> one space for every studio, and one bedroom unit, and two spaces for two or more bedrooms. <br /> Mr. Pesce mentioned he is working with Horsley Witten, and would like the Board to condition <br /> any approval that they respond and address any Pesce Engineering comments in the preliminary <br /> report, and future final report that will be generated within the next two weeks. <br /> 15 <br />