Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mashpee Inclusion and Diversity Committee <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, MA 02649 <br />Ms. Stevenson noted the original brochure had a photo of the members; this one will have our <br />new logo. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson inquired if the original template could be accessed and forwarded, Ms. Hanscom <br />forwarded the template to the subgroup. <br /> <br />Logo Update <br />The Town Manager commented on the Logo, he cautioned that the image will be hard to <br />decipher when shrunk. Dan Kupferman agreed it would be tiny when added to the newspaper <br />column. <br /> <br />Winnie Johnson- Graham noted the font can be changed. The Chair added she is looking to <br />incorporate this into a tablecloth or banner, so it will be enlarged. <br /> <br />Richard Klein would like to reuse the banners for Race Amity Day, and this new portable item <br />with our logo could be used for all other events. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br />Rolf Brandt made a motion to approve up to $200.00 of MIDC funds to be used <br />towards signage incorporating the new Committee logo. Seconded by Gail <br />Wilson. All in favor. <br /> <br />Proposed Survey <br />This subgroup used the Plymouth No Place for Hate survey as an example, they found that <br />survey would be a great ‘Next Step’ or ‘Step Two’. Ms. Hanscom noted they were looking for <br />more of a starting point, establishing a baseline, and getting an understanding of our presence. <br />Do people even know what we do? This will act as a needs assessment for this Committee; to <br />drive visibility and awareness. It was shortened and kept simple. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated the Survey Monkey for the Coalition generated a 30% response rate, <br />which is decent. <br /> <br />Ms. Hanscom would encourage MIDC not to use social media platforms, i.e. The Mashpee <br />Message, to launch official business. However, if a member, acting as a resident, would like to <br />share said item, that is completely fine. <br /> <br />Dan Kupferman noted there was some confusion in the wording for the ranking of priorities. <br />The survey was edited to reflect changes. <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />