Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br /> abutters' property line; S.A.S. will be 8' off of the street property line; S.A.S. will be <br /> 45' from the BVW. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if the driveway was going over the abutter's property. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky stated that it did now. The lot has all been surveyed. <br /> Ms. Warden asked if the system was certified as a failure. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky stated that it wasn't certified as a failure. However, if you go 3' you <br /> get a cesspool 10' away from a wetland. It would be a serious failure. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that his only problem was that he wanted to confirm <br /> bedrooms because it was a sizable addition. He hasn't seen a floor plan. <br /> Mr. Doherty asked Mr. Slavinsky how many bedrooms there were right now. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky replied that there were three bedrooms. A big part of the addition is <br /> going to be a garage with a non-heated storage area, which Title V specifically <br /> states will not be considered a bedroom. He will definitely give Mr. Harrington the <br /> plans. <br /> Mr. Santos seconded the motion with the stipulation that the health agents use the <br /> building plans to certify that there are no bedrooms. Motion Passed. <br /> APPOINTMENT: Cape and Islands Eng. 37 Shore Drive <br /> The applicant is requesting the following variances: The septic tank will be 3 1/2' <br /> off the crawl space. The soil absorption system and reserve soil absorption system <br /> will be 7' off the street property line. The reserve soil absorption system will be 5' <br /> off the northeast property line. <br /> Mr. Harrington began by stating that he and Mr. Slavinsky did the perk test on <br /> this property because of size constraints. The cesspool being in the back creates <br /> the necessity for moving some of the plumbing inside the foundation of the rear <br /> part of the house. The forward part is crawl space. It was determined that the <br /> plumbing could be changed over to the rear left corner to come out the front to a <br /> tank and leaching. They squeezed in a reserve area. If it were to be used they <br /> would have to do something with the waterline. In it's current condition to the <br /> primary it seems to be in compliance. <br /> Mr. Doherty asked how the soil was up there. <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that it was beautiful, running sand. <br /> Ms. Warden asked if this was in failure. And did it require engineered plans. <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that he believed that it had been in failure. He reviewed the <br /> file and noted that the septic system did fail by inspection. He did not actually <br /> certify it. The applicants went to engineered plans on their own. <br />