My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-BOARD OF HEALTH
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
BOARD OF HEALTH
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001-BOARD OF HEALTH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2019 2:41:54 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:22:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/31/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> Mr. Doherty continued the conversation that they have made requirements with <br /> restaurants that allow smoking to have some type of air quality control and <br /> maintenance of that system. The BOH will have to develop a policy to follow up on <br /> the recommendations. The BOH has all winter to complete this program. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> Mark DeDecko Quality Homes re: 6 Equestrian Avenue <br /> Mark DeDecko of Quality Homes came before the BOH members to discuss a <br /> development on Quashnet Road named Equestrian Avenue. They had originally <br /> submitted a septic plan to the BOH for their approval. It didn't show a <br /> denitrification system. Mr. DeDecko voluntarily, before the Planning Board, agreed <br /> to go with the denitrification system on this project rather than jump through a lot <br /> of hoops with this project. Primarily because it is a ten-lot subdivision they walked <br /> a fine line between testing or not to do the testing. The Planning Board allowed him <br /> that if he did the testing and the worse case scenario came up then they would <br /> have to do the denitrification systems. The Planning Board then said to him that he <br /> voluntarily did the denitrification systems then they wouldn't become involved in a <br /> lot of the testing. He agreed to do that. They designed the plan and submitted it to <br /> the Board of Health, in the interim. However, he didn't pick up on the conditions of <br /> the Planning Board at that time together with submitting the plan to the Board of <br /> Health. He submitted the plan and it was approved by the BOH with the regular <br /> septic Title V system. But, after looking at the conditions of the Planning Board <br /> they realized they then needed to do a denitrification system. They redesigned and <br /> revised the plan. It is exactly the same layout of the plan with the castings and <br /> everything in the same position. It just falls under a denitrification system. They <br /> installed a denitrification system that falls under general use. He spoke with Mr. <br /> Harrington earlier in the week and discussed testing. He feels that they fall into a <br /> general use permit in this particular situation. He would like to know what testing <br /> is required? <br /> Ms. Warden that Mr. DeDecko wants to install a"Micro-fast". There is a"micro- <br /> fast"a"single family home fast" and the "fast' system. This particular unit is <br /> approved under provisional use only. Both health agents asked Mr. DeDecko if he <br /> would research the issue and determine which one is approved for general use. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that the micro-fast system is approved for general use that <br /> doesn't require any monitoring. <br /> Mr. DeDecko confirmed that his research showed that the Micro-fast is approved. <br /> He was going to provide the BOH with a request for reducing the requirement for <br /> testing. He does have to do the required testing by the state that is part of their <br /> permit for the micro-fast system. He will have a yearly maintenance contract and <br /> quarterly testing. Unfortunately, he didn't bring the paper with the list of those <br /> tests that are required by the state. <br /> Mr. Ball asked why they were making him do this?Where was groundwater? <br /> Mr. DeDecko responded that groundwater was at least 25' down. The reason he <br /> has to do this is based on a report that goes back to the Cape Cod Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.