Laserfiche WebLink
map with the information . <br /> Tom Fudala explained a change in zoning, which happened in Oct. <br /> 1991 , but was not put in the Code book regarding groundwater <br /> protection district. The school is a prohibited use within a <br /> Zone II of an existing or proposed public water supply . That <br /> creates a problem for the 151 site. <br /> Mr. Dinizio explained he went to a Water District meeting last <br /> nigh and there was debate about which site is more adversely <br /> effected by a high school . The Chairman would not put this issue <br /> to a vote but 2 members went on record that they would prefer to <br /> preserve the 151 site but it is not an official position . <br /> Tom Fudala presented information to the Committee showing the <br /> wells in question . <br /> Selectmen Mills stated the opinion of value from the appraiser <br /> stated the Center site has 42 house lots, 3 with possible <br /> contamination problems. Tom said he disagrees with those <br /> numbers. He is prepared to defend his figures. <br /> Mr. Jones said either way , a sewage treatment plant is better <br /> • than individual septic systems. <br /> Site Utilities: Mr. Dinizio received a letter form Mr. Rich of <br /> the Water District stating the cost to run the water main to the <br /> Center site, if included as part of the project would be <br /> $197 , 000 , if bid separately about $215 , 000. Mr. Franceschi said <br /> Mr. Rich told him it would cost about $260,000 but it is <br /> "reasonable to assume" the water district will share in some of <br /> the cost. <br /> Selectmen Mills asked about the permitted sewage treatment <br /> plant - would the high school flow be less then 180 condos? Mr . <br /> Franceschi explained it would be less and still have room to <br /> spare. Tom explained they were considering tieing town hall and <br /> the future elementary school into the plant. <br /> Ms . Mills asked if they knew there were 2 other treatment plants <br /> in this water shed? Mr Franceschi stated he did not but it is <br /> preferable to have sewage treatment plant instead of individual <br /> septic systems . The permit is for 32 , 000 gallons , is good until <br /> Jan. 1995 is transferrable and extendable . <br /> Deidre Greelish said she read in DRA' s report that getting a <br /> discharge permit for the 151 site could possibly delay the <br /> project. Isn't it a parallel process? <br /> Mr. Franceschi stated it is a parallel process but if the <br /> • approval of the STP is not granted in time, there could be a <br /> potential delay . It is hard to get a short review from DEP. <br /> 3 <br />