Laserfiche WebLink
building cost would have to get down to $90 per sq foot if outdoor <br /> facilities are to be kept as shown on site plan. The building cost is <br /> still $100 per sq foot. <br /> There is no allowance for inflation and Chartwell feels there needs to be. <br /> Paul told Daedalus the project will be bid in Feb/Mar. 1995 , what is the <br /> effect? <br /> He responded they know that and the pricing reflects that. <br /> Everyone reviewed the revised estimate. <br /> Internal partitions increased but there is still question , on the <br /> estimators part, of how much CMU vs. wallboard will be used. He made some <br /> assumptions in the estimate. <br /> Mechanical/Electrical - large increase from the September estimate Why? <br /> Joel said is has come down $450,000 from the Oct. 18 estimate . The <br /> September estimate was based on a square footage cost only. <br /> Paul said that was supposed to be a goal SMMA would try to design to. <br /> Based on history and past jobs, this area seems way out of whack. <br /> Ray said the total building cost is $100 per sq foot, which compared <br /> historically to other projects is close to where it should be. <br /> Paul said it is really $105 per sq foot because the STP was shifted to the <br /> site work, which it should not be. The site development is way off from <br /> what was originally budgeted. The finished project has to be completed for <br /> $110 per sq foot, no matter how you break it out. Today it is $107 . <br /> Paul explained the ball fields got to this point because Mashpee has a <br /> shortfall and we are now trying to make up for that on this very tight <br /> budget. <br /> Tom Wren said there are 2 areas of big dollars, mechanical and site work. <br /> Bob said they will have to look at mechanical , electrical again. Tonight <br /> the Committee has to address the site and try to bring it down. <br /> Bob explained they prepared a list of items which SMMA believes are value <br /> added and they request the money in the contingency be moved over. <br /> Paul said the first two items Brick exterior and duel fuel boilers are way <br /> out of whack. <br /> Ed reminded him the numbers the Committee used for the value added process <br /> were not their numbers. <br /> Paul said this is a sore subject with him. This Committee specified from <br /> day 1 that this would be a brick building, now SMMA wants to make it a <br /> value added ! He will not eat the whole amount as a value added. <br /> Bob said the Committee always said it would be a masonry building- that <br /> doesn 't necessarily mean brick. <br /> - Duel Fuel- Chartwell said it would cost $66 ,000 , now SMMA is saying <br /> $180,000? <br /> Bob said the location of the oil tank , and the containment of the tank was <br /> no included in the original number. <br /> - Pedestrian Walkway - up Old Barnstable Rd, the Committee has not decided <br /> upon that yet. <br /> - Outdoor maintenance storage and outdoor athletic equipment storage - <br /> those issue have to be dealt with . Paul said these do not look cheap - $40 <br /> per sq foot seems excessive. <br /> - Motion Detectors and CCTV- Paul agrees they are value added but there was <br /> 7 <br />