Laserfiche WebLink
37 . 2 <br /> 39. 2 <br /> pg. 4 additional recommendations. <br /> 1 . 1 <br /> 2. 1 <br /> 3 . 3 <br /> 4. 2 <br /> 5 . Where are these windows. Ed said they have not chosen specific 15 , they <br /> feel they can get it down by 15 . <br /> 5 . 1 <br /> 7 . 1 . <br /> The Committee went back and discussed the number ones . <br /> 4. Bob said they can save $9 , 000 but it won't be fabric acoustical panels. <br /> The Committee agreed. <br /> 12 . Same thing in the gym. Committee agreed. <br /> 16 . From GWB to acoustical tile ground floor and second floor lobby. <br /> Committee agreed. <br /> 18. Ed said they can save half of that associated savings. Committee agreed <br /> for a $6 , 000 savings. <br /> 20. Is a design issue. Ed said the Committee can obligate them to save 1/2 <br /> of this amount. Merry Sue is concerned about effect on design . <br /> 21 . Committee agreed, take the whole amount. <br /> 21a. This gives light to the interior classrooms. Committee does not <br /> agree. <br /> 31 1 . Ray was going to review this. The Committee has already taken a <br /> $40 , 000 savings . Anything more removes any design potential and obligates <br /> industrial type lighting . <br /> 32 . Change to a 3. <br /> Pg. 4 1 . Cafeteria roof slope . Ed said he would rather this Committee <br /> take this one and allow the skylights in the other corridor. There will <br /> still be natural light here, becomes a question of quantity. <br /> Committee agreed to take it. <br /> 2 . Paul thinks the Committee should take it. <br /> Ed said he would like to investigate a block building in total . Because of <br /> the magnitude of the problem. He will try to provide places the Committee <br /> can go to look at a block building. <br /> Paul said he recently saw a grey block building and it looked good . <br /> Ed said block has the potential for texture and color choices, patterns to <br /> break up the scale. <br /> They cannot take the $99 ,000 and $370,000 savings. There would be about <br /> $300,000 savings associated with a block building . <br /> Paul suggested the Committee take #2 and then look at the rest of the <br /> building . <br /> Ed would rather the Committee allow SMMA to prove they can make a good <br /> looking building with all block. <br /> Peter thinks the Committee should go with the Architects recommendation, it <br /> could save $300,000. <br /> Bill said if after going out to bid , this come in low, what can we add <br /> things back? <br /> Paul said there is a big list of alternates. <br /> ** Bill made a motion that the first alternate (to be added back) is <br /> 9 <br />