My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NA-MASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT MANAGEMENT
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
>
NA-MASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2021 4:04:24 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br /> FACSIMILE I1h r,,,- \J1J � iJ L <br /> Temporary Project Office <br /> Tel 508 4772868 <br /> Fax 508 539 0821 <br /> Mashpee High School Project Management <br /> Joel Seeley, SMMA <br /> Tertiary Stage Technology Sub-Consultant <br /> May 11, 1995 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 4. Fourth sentence to paragraph 2, page 1 . Could the end of this sentence be <br /> strengthened; such as "...will, on completion, and for the duration of the warranty <br /> period, all function together as a homogeneous and indivisible whole in complete <br /> integration." ? <br /> 5. What are the likely warranty periods of the equipment and how will they tie-in with the <br /> certificate to be provided by the Tertiary Stage sub-consultant as comment 4 above? <br /> 6. Final testing. Is the Fall of 1996 as stated in paragraph 3 to page 1 sufficiently precise <br /> and in advance of the needs of the school? We suggest that the Superintendent of <br /> Schools should be consulted on this. <br /> 7. Is it the intention that the Tertiary Stage sub-consultant, being responsible for final <br /> acceptance testing, will under-write the work of Childs and CCR? For example, at final <br /> acceptance testing if, for whatever reason, a persistent 'bug' is found which could be <br /> said by the vendor(s) to originate from the design rather than the installation, how will <br /> it be treated? Apart from SMMA, which of the technology consultants will "own" the <br /> problem and its speedy resolution so as not to delay the operation of the technological <br /> needs of the school? <br /> 8. Phase 1 ; paragraphs 1 and 2. Could these line items lead to a rethink on what has <br /> already taken place as regards the Technology Program? With respect to comment 7 <br /> above, would it not be better if the Tertiary Stage sub-consultant is obliged to inherit <br /> the existing Technology Program? Or, if not, are Childs and CCR going to sign-off on <br /> any changes the Tertiary Stage sub-consultant may wish to make so that all three are <br /> in complete technical unison? <br /> 9. Phase 1 , line-item 3. Meaning of "site" [Read 'Town"]? Presumably, "all existing <br /> systems" includes a review and analysis of the infrastructure wiring and anything to be <br /> constructed under the General Contract. If changes are found to be necessary, will <br /> instructions be issued to tie-in to the needs of the General Contractor's Schedule? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.