Laserfiche WebLink
"11 Except that no building in any industrial district may be located within 150 feet of Routes <br /> 28 or 151." or take any other action relating thereto. <br /> Submitted by Board of Selectmen <br /> Explanation: This article would maintain a 150-foot setback requirement from Routes 28 and <br /> 151 in Industrial zoning districts, but otherwise reduce front setbacks in those districts to 75 feet, <br /> which is currently the applicable front setback from private streets in industrial districts. This <br /> amendment is proposed because of recent and proposed conversions of streets in industrial areas <br /> from private to Town roads, which under current zoning would increase required setbacks from <br /> those streets from 75 to 150 feet. <br /> Planning Board voted at a Public Hearing held on April 23, 2003 for approval. <br /> Motion made by Wayne Taylor. <br /> Motion: I move the Town vote to amend to Section 174-31 of the Zoning Bylaw, as printed in <br /> the warrant. <br /> i <br /> Motion passes unanimously at 9:41 p.m. f <br /> Article 27 <br /> To see if the Town will amend Section 174-55.0 as follows: <br /> In an industrial district, one (1) freestanding sign is permitted on each lot, provided that it does <br /> not stand forty (40) square feet in signboard area, does not exceed five (5) feet in height and is <br /> located closer than fifty(50) feet to a lot line. In commercial districts, one (1) freestanding stand <br /> per road access point is permitted. Such signs may not exceed forty(40) square feet in signboard <br /> area and may not be closer than twelve (12) feet to any lot line. The top edge of any such ` <br /> freestanding sign shall not be higher than twenty-five (25) vertical measure above the average <br /> level of the ground between the supports of each sign or take any other action related thereto. <br /> Submitted by Petition <br /> Explanation: The purpose of this Article would allow a commercial business that is not visible <br /> from the road to advertise itself at a road access point. The purpose would only be to advertise a <br /> business that could not be seen from the road. y <br /> Planning Board voted at a Public Hearing held on April 23, 2003 5-0 to make no <br /> recommendation. <br /> Motion made by Arthur DePaul. <br /> Motion: I move the.Article 27 be voted as printed in the warrant with the exception of the <br /> phrase, "or take any other action relating thereto'. <br /> Motion made to move question at 9:46 p.m. <br /> 27 <br /> y <br />