1988-1990-ZBA APPEALS (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Appeals Minutes August 9, 1989 Page 2. e • In January of 1988 there remain 20 lots that have not been sold. So the Board extended for 6 months. Now there are 6 lots left. During the extension period 14 lots were built upon. Now they have 6 remaining and it was determined by Town Counsel and the" Board of Appeals that it would be necessary to reapply rather than seek fui:ther extensions.For.this reason applications have been filed for each of these 6 lots. Situation remains exactly as was the case at the time the original.variances were granted on 45 lots in 1986. And Mr. Anderson respectfully requests that the Board of Appeals grant a release in each case.to allow these to be classified as buildable lots. John Grassetti (abutter) questioned the grandfather clause and whether it was acre zoning or � acre zoning. Doug Boyd.explained that they could build.on a � acre provided the Board of Appeals states that they -can. It is acre zoning unless the Board states its k acre zoning. John Grassetti stated that he feels it should be acre zoning. Mr. Anderson explained that.they are not building, they are under a conditional Purchase and Sale agreement to the same.builder which he believes is one of the Dacy companies.: • John Friel made a motion to vote to approve this request for variances for all 6 ofthe main lots. Richard Halpern seconded. All agreed. Robert Hansen - (Owner of record: Robert H. and Janet K. Hansen) Requests a Variance under Section 7.7 ofthe Land Space Requirements for permission to construct an addition--:, deck and in -ground poll within 50 feet of wetlands in an r-3 zoning district on property located at 31 Keel Way (Map 120, Block 134) Mashpee, MA. Members sitting: Cheryl Hawver, Richard Halpern, John Friel Susan Asnus from Warwich Associates represented the applicant. Plans were presented. As shown they are proposing to construct and maintain an addition as well as a deck and in-ground.pool. As the plan sits now, the.only portion,.of that, that is within the 50 feet is.a small portion of the deck, and some of,the swimming pool. Photographs were presented. Ms...Ansnus,- explained that the lot is a very well treed lot. The top of the bank is basically a line of shubbery, so in reality they are going to be 43 feet from the line. Ms. Asnus stated that they do not believe that this will have any adverse effects on the resource areas and they are requesting the variance from this set back requirement. •