Laserfiche WebLink
Board of appeals Minutes August 9, 1989 Page 3. <br />• Cheryl Hawver questioned what the lot coverage would be with <br />all this added. <br />Susan Asnus expressed that she believed they were calculated <br />but she did not have them to present. Approximatley one -fifths. <br />zone. <br />John Friel questioned if it was closer than 43 feet from the <br />Susan Asnus stated that it is closer than 43 feet. <br />Cheryl Hawver read correspondence from the Conservation Agent. <br />"The Conservation Committee has no comments on this case as the <br />filing was indefinitely postponed at our meeting.on.6/15/89. <br />Whatever.;- -`'concerns we might.have, will be addressed when <br />the hearing is continued." <br />Susan Asnus stated tha.tit was the Conservation Committees <br />interpretation that it was from the closest resource. <br />Doug Boyd does not agree with the Conservation Committee and <br />with the 50 feet and where it begins. <br />Richard Halpern made a motion that they grant the variance <br />• of 7 feet which would make it 43.feet to the top of the bank <br />under section 7.7 John Friel seconded. All agreed. <br />Mary Tully <br />