1988-1990-ZBA APPEALS (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Appeals - Minutes - January 10, 1990 Page 3. Represented by Paul Lelito a private environmental consultant. On a proposed construction of a 130 foot walkway, 70' of the walkway will cross the existing salt marsh and the remaining 38' will cross the upland area adjacent to the salt marsh. The additional structures associated with the walkway are two 3" galvanized pips which will be located westerly in the open water of the end ofthe walkway. The purpose of the walkway is to gain access to the dingys which will be located at the end of the walk- way. There are two moorings owned by Mr. Cohen and are presently in place. The purpose of the walkway is to provide access from two lots #145 and =146. The construction material will be pressure treated, southern yellow pine, minimum distance elevation above the marsh will be 4'. The separation of planking will be 1' separation which will allow sufficient penetration of light to protect the salt marsh below the proposed structure. Paul Somerville __ (Shellfish Department) submitted a memo to the Board of Appeals. M'-. Somerville i stated that he reviewed the plans of the project. He does not feel as though this project ::ill cause a substantial disruption degradation of the marine or coastal environment if the following steps are taken: 1) That the structure conditioned to be used is set forth in the report submitted with this proposal that is a dingy for access to other ve=_s 1s moored in another location. 2) That there be some written legal documentation that his structure will serve both property and that some easements will be provided for. This should prevent any future attempt__ for obtaining a pier structure at a later date. Cheryl Hawver asked for public comments. Mr. George Darcy abutter from lot -1144 wishes to object to the petition. Mr. Darcy stated that eventually there will be a float required if they have a dingy dock because the tide goes up and down. He also believes that it is much longer than 138 '. He feels as though it will bring a lot of traffic in:o the cove. Mr. Darcy stated that the Lipkins had been restricted by New Seabury Corporation to have a single pier for each two houses. The pier would also obstruct the view from the 5th lot. Mr.Darcv recommended to the Board that approval not be given until a redesign is submitted, bring it to a single pier for both lots in all fairness. Mr. Hanrahan stated that they were not requesting permission to build a float. 0