1988-1990-ZBA APPEALS (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes - May 24, 1989 Page 6. Mr. Furlani said the biggest,problem is that the building went up without proper notification. Ms. Driscoll commented that no one objects to the boatyard but that the changes should not be substantially more non -conforming than the previous use. Mr. Virgilio asked Mr. Burtis how many buildings had been removed. Mr. Burtis replied that 14 had been torn down, cottages and sheds. Mr. Hanrahan asked for a show of hands of those in favor and opposed. Mr. Halpern moved to take the petition under advisement. Ms. Hawver seconded. All agreed. P. F. O'Connor - (Owners of record: Subon Co. and Austin B. O'Brien, TR) Requests a Special Permit under Section 6.3.E.8 and 6.3.G.6 of the Land Use Regulations for permission to operate a lumber yard/storage in a C-2 and I-1 zoning district on property located on Roue 130 (Map 19, Blocks 10 and 11) Mashpee, MA. (Request for re -issue of SP -86-02-012) P. F. O'Connor - (Owners of record: Subon Co. and Austin B. O'Brien, TR) Requests a Variance under Section 8.5 of the Land Space Requirements for permission to vary the parking requirements in a C-2 and I-1 zoning district on property located on Route 130 (Map 19, Blocks 10 and 11) Mashpee, MA. (Request for re -issue of V-86-02-013) • Members sitting: W. Hanrahan, C. Hawver, E. Govoni Mr. O'Connor explained that the petitions were the same as requested in 1986. Due to economic conditions he had not proceeded with the construction. Mr. Hanrahan read the details from the 1986 decisions. Mr. Govoni explained that the lot coverage provisions in the zoning by-law had changed since the original permit was issued. Tony Ferragamo, Chairman of the Planning Board, said that the new lot coverage provisions make it difficult to plan any industrial buildings. He said it is almost impossible to plan a building with 30% of impervious area and that 50% seems to be the operating average. He said Design Review had considered the O'Connor plan a good plan and the landscaping was good. He said that the lot coverage restrictions under the new Groundwater Protection District were not covered in the advertising and a new permit application would be required. Mr. Boyd explained that Mr. O'Connor could have put in the foundation before the permits expired but he had asked him to delay until he came before the Board again. . Ms. Hawver stated that it was a good plan in 1986 and Mr. O'Connor had shown good faith by not commencing construction. Ms. Hawver moved to grant the Special Permit to operate a lumber yard and storage in a • C-1 zoning district. Mr. Govoni seconded. All agreed.