My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-1988-ZONING BY-LAWS
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BY-LAWS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
1985-1988-ZONING BY-LAWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2025 2:05:11 PM
Creation date
12/19/2016 10:00:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BY-LAWS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/31/1988
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(d ) Are the proposed covenants , restrictions or <br /> deeds regarding the open space adequate to <br /> ensure its protection under the standards of <br /> this section and are they legally acceptable <br /> to the Town Counsel ? <br /> (e ) Is the proposal generally in conformance with <br /> the requirements and comments of the <br /> Conservation Commission , Board of Health , <br /> Design Review Committee and the other Town <br /> officials and agencies noted in Subsection <br /> 9 . 3 .2 . ? <br /> (f ) Should the development qualify for the full <br /> bonuses allowed by Subsection 9.3 .4 because it <br /> preserves critical open space and natural <br /> resource areas for the benefit of the <br /> inhabitants of the Town? ( Unless there are <br /> serious problems regarding the layout of the <br /> development , proposed or existing uses on or <br /> adjacent to the proposed open space , or <br /> serious potential adverse effects on public <br /> health , safety and welfare , open space which <br /> meets all of the requirements of Section 9. 3 . 3 <br /> should normally qualify for the full bonus <br /> allowed . ) ? <br /> (g ) Does the proposed development conform with the <br /> standards of Subsection 9 .3 . ? <br /> (h ) Will the project have a safe and adequate <br /> access to a road listed in Subsection 9 . 3 . 1 ? <br /> i <br /> ( i ) Have the location of structures , building <br /> heights and setbacks between buildings been <br /> approved (where required ) by the Fire Chief? <br /> (j )- Does the proposed development conform with the <br /> requirements of Subsection 9 . 3 . 6? <br /> (k ) Will the proposed development be superior to <br /> alternative plans in preserving open space for <br /> conservation and public recreation , in its use <br /> of the natural features of the land and in <br /> allowing for more efficient provision of <br /> public services? <br /> ( 1 ) Is the proposed .development in the best <br /> interests of the public health , safety and <br /> general welfare? <br /> 9 - 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.